No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 28, 1997

    Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997)

    …new trial for Owens-Illinois. It held that the burden-shifting instruction was error but harmless, and that the tobacco company defense issue was controlled by Richards, so the plaintiffs' judgment against Owens-Illinois was not…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 17, 1995

    Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995)

    …upholding the jury's findings that Owens-Illinois's Kaylo insulation was defective and was 100 percent responsible, and holding that Owens-Illinois waived its claim to allocate fault to the Navy. A product such as…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)

    …on asbestos causation. The trial court—noting that the added language was taken from key asbestos causation cases—denied their motion for new trial. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …not Bakkie's burden, to prove fault attributable to others. (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 478-479.) Union Carbide did present such evidence and successfully convinced the jury that it…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion

    Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)

    …A Lite 0% CertainTeed Corp. 5% Pipe Covering/Block Insulation Armstrong, Inc. 0% Owens-Illinois 0% Pittsburg Corning 0% Johns Manville 20% JT Thorpe and Son, Inc. 0% Metalclad Insulation Corp. 0% Refractiories/Castables AP Green…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Green v. CertainTEED Corporation (2015)

    …Step One Turning to step one, California and Texas apply different standards to determine the issue of causation in asbestos litigation. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), sets forth the "substantial…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)

    …was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Hake v. Allied Fluid Products Corp. (2018)

    …was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …types of product defects: (1) manufacturing defects; (2) design defects, and (3) warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\].) The third…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …types of product defects: (1) manufacturing defects; (2) design defects, and (3) warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, [\1359] 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\].) The…