24 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)
…encompass the issue whether Whitmire had been sufficiently exposed to asbestos due to Bechtel's conduct to conclude that Bechtel asbestos was a "substantial factor" in causing Whitmire's mesothelioma. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., supra…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)
…sources, jury reasonably allocated 85 percent share of comparative fault to Union Carbide where it submitted no evidence detailing plaintiff's exposure from other sources\]; Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)
…In so doing, appellants are not "expected to prove the scientifically unknown details of carcinogenesis, or trace the unknowable path of a given asbestos fiber." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976.…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)
…L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion
Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)
…a substantial factor in causing Dr. Behshid's mesothelioma. This contention is not persuasive. Causation in asbestos cases In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the Supreme Court held that the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)
…the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Turley v. Familian Corporation (2017)
…factor in causing Webb's mesothelioma. (See Rutherford, supra, 16 Cal.4th at pp. 976-977;Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 476.)" (Webb, supra, 63 Cal.4th at p. 193…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion
Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)
…case involving a supplier of raw asbestos incorporated into those products. (Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1529, 1533-1536; Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Paulus v. Crane Co. (2014)
…the defendant's asbestos products was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to his risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-958 \[67…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · May 23, 2016 · in the opinion
Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)
…Electric's asbestos was a substantial factor in causing Webb's mesothelioma. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976-977; Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Green v. CertainTEED Corporation (2015)
…Step One Turning to step one, California and Texas apply different standards to determine the issue of causation in asbestos litigation. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), sets forth the "substantial…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Burch v. Certainteed Corporation (2019)
…to prove causation by establishing a reasonable medical probability that exposure to a defendant's product contributed to the plaintiff's risk of developing cancer. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)
…MM's arguments in turn. A. Morgan's Exposure to J-MM Asbestos-cement Pipe Our Supreme Court examined causation in asbestos cases in depth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)
…containing CalPortland product. A plaintiff claiming asbestos-related injuries must establish some exposure to the asbestos-containing product or activity for which the defendant is responsible. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Ransom v. Calaveras Asbestos, Ltd. (2009)
…27 Cal.3d 465, 477-478, fn. 11; see Rest.2d Torts, § 433 B(2); Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 476-477, fn. 11; Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 17, 2000 · in the opinion
Ashdown v. Ameron International Corp. (2000)
…the date of the decedent's injury as a matter of law. Appellants cite the Supreme Court's opinion in Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Baeza v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)
…employer had no liability for plaintiff's injuries beyond payment of workers' compensation benefits\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1198 \[applied Proposition 51 to strict liability asbestos case\].) Defendant…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)
…2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 292, 332.) III. Section 3294 Punitive damages serve the dual public purposes of punishment and deterrence. (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658; see § 3294…