10 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Strickland v. Union Carbide Corp. (2013)
…Zogarts (1975) 14 Cal.3d 104, 110.) Law Governing Proof of Causation in Asbestos Cases Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) sets forth the controlling standard for proving causation in an…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Hernandez v. Amcord, Inc. (2013)
…factor in causing Mr. Hernandez's mesothelioma to a reasonable degree of medical probability. The trial court cited Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)
…the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)
…MM's arguments in turn. A. Morgan's Exposure to J-MM Asbestos-cement Pipe Our Supreme Court examined causation in asbestos cases in depth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)
…containing CalPortland product. A plaintiff claiming asbestos-related injuries must establish some exposure to the asbestos-containing product or activity for which the defendant is responsible. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion
Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)
…asbestos-related cancer cases, the plaintiff may seek to prove causation by establishing years of exposure to multiple manufacturers' asbestos-containing products. In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, the California Supreme…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)
…series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)
…owned by defendant Unocal Corporation, that term is used to refer to either an owner or a possessor of land that owes some kind of duty of care to keep the premises safe. (See Alcaraz v…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 20, 2007 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2007)
…negligence theory) unless the manufacturer had actual or constructive knowledge of the potential hazard. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.) Unocal contends the notion of what constitutes a "hazard…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)
…to protect themselves against it, and \[¶\] (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger." Thus, a landowner owes a duty to invitees to exercise reasonable care in maintaining the premises. (§ 343; see […