No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · California Supreme Court · May 15, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2000)

    …California Amicus Curiae Committee as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents. Morgenstein & Jubelirer and Bruce A. Wagman, San Francisco, for Owens-Illinois, Inc., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents. Wartnick, Chaber…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Benavidez v. Fluor Corp. (2021)

    …a particular exposure or series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982-983…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …case involving a supplier of raw asbestos incorporated into those products. (Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1529, 1533-1536; Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2008 · in the opinion

    Garza v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2008)

    …Arena court for extending the holdings of Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 38 Cal. Rptr.2d 739 and Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1529…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)

    …and thus pointless. For the guidance of the trial court, we note that the matter is now before our Supreme Court. (Coughlin v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1993) 31 Cal. App.4th 1633 \[27 Cal. Rptr.2d…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    …long latency period of asbestos-related disease, and the occupational settings that commonly exposed the worker to multiple forms and brands of asbestos products with varying degrees of toxicity." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · February 16, 2016 · in the opinion

    Walashek v. Air Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …medical probability that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a "legal cause" of his injury — i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …context of products liability actions, the plaintiff must prove that the defective products supplied by the defendant were a substantial factor in bringing about his or her injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1999

    Howard v. Owens Corning (1999)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens Corning on a jury verdict that Howard's asbestos exposure was not a cause of his injury, and rejected the Howards' claim that they were entitled to…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Shields v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …strictly liable for failure to warn of risks arising from other manufacturers' products — the court began with the general rule formulated in its decision in Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1998

    Gutierrez v. Cassiar Mining Corp. (1998)

    …called for much of the monitoring. The trial court refused Cassiar's requested jury instruction saying a defendant owes only for monitoring additional to or different from what those conditions require. The Court of Appeal held…