No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)

    …encompass the issue whether Whitmire had been sufficiently exposed to asbestos due to Bechtel's conduct to conclude that Bechtel asbestos was a "substantial factor" in causing Whitmire's mesothelioma. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., supra…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …Esq, Morgenstein & Jubelirer LLP, San Francisco, for Amicus Curiae Owens-Illinois, Inc. Certified for Partial Publication.\[\\] [\241] SEPULVEDA, J. This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs Lois and Daniel Wilson, Sr.\[1\] following a…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …not Bakkie's burden, to prove fault attributable to others. (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 478-479.) Union Carbide did present such evidence and successfully convinced the jury that it…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)

    …and thus pointless. For the guidance of the trial court, we note that the matter is now before our Supreme Court. (Coughlin v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1993) 31 Cal. App.4th 1633 \[27 Cal. Rptr.2d…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 8, 2015 · in the opinion

    Shiffer v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    …asbestos products was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to \[the\] risk of developing cancer.' (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-958 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2009 · in the opinion

    Short v. Sequoia Ventures, Inc. (2009)

    …and accepted" doctrine, under which a builder or designer of a real property improvement owes no duty to a third party injured by a patent defect after the owner accepts the completed improvement. (See Jones v…