6 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)
…Corp., Owens-Illinois Inc. Peter E. Carlson, Kelley Drye & Warren, Chicago, IL, Debra L. Burns, Bose McKinney & Evans, Indianapolis, IN, George E. Purdy, Bose McKinney & Evans, Indianapolis, IN, for Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. Robin L. Babbitt…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · May 14, 1998 · in the opinion
Spoonamore v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1998)
…IN, for Owens-Corning Fiberglas. Robin L. Babbitt, Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman, Indianapolis, IN, Robert A. Bunda, Bunda Stutz & Dewitt, Toledo, OH, for Owens-Illinois Glass Container. ORDER on MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT McKINNEY, District Judge…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)
…maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner v. Alfa Laval…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001 · in the opinion
Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)
…whom an injured plaintiff otherwise could have sought recovery, his or her tort remedy is far from complete. This fact is highlighted by our supreme court's recent decision in Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · May 14, 1999 · in the opinion
Spoonamore v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1999)
…to evidence that links a John Crane product to Mr. Spoonamore's illness. Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 102 F.3d 1429, 1433 (7th Cir.1996). In order to withstand a motion for summary judgment…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 2004 · in the opinion
Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2004)
…N.E.2d 637, 639 (Ind.1991) ("A landowner owes the highest duty to an invitee: a duty to exercise reasonable care for his protection while he is on the landowner's premises."), reh'g denied…