13 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · April 23, 1998
Strickland v. Owens Corning (1998)
The Sixth Circuit held the district court abused its discretion in denying Owens Corning's new-trial/remittitur motion and remanded for a remittitur reducing the judgment to no more than $883,731 (50% fault), failing…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)
…causation where there are many possible sources of asbestos exposure, jurisdictions have fashioned different causation standards: "1) the California Supreme Court's \exposure-to-risk' test of Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 15, 2016 · in the opinion
Mannahan v. Eaton Corporation (2016)
…similar products at the same time periods and worksites. Not uncommonly, plaintiffs have been unable to prove direct exposure to a given defendant's product." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203, 1218 (Cal…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 10, 2017 · in the opinion
Stallings v. Georgia Pacific Corp. (2017)
…court subsequently issues a decision contrary to our own, we are required to adopt prospectively the state decision clarifying state law. See Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., 311 U.S. 538, 543 (1941) ("appellate tribunals…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion
McGuire v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)
…searching cross-examination, to that which Raybestos has in the current litigation. Id. at 1295. The second of these cases is Murphy v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 779 F.2d 340 (6th Cir. 1985). Murphy recognized the…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · August 9, 2019
Schneider Electric USA, Inc. v. Williams (2019)
…not bar a separate claim for non-work-related asbestos injury from a parent's workplace; damages may be apportioned between the two roles under the Owens Corning approach. Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion
Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)
…respect to negligence. Inclusion of Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. Norris argues that the trial court committed reversible error by including Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. We disagree. In Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · September 11, 2015 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. (2015)
…and ultimately settled with or dismissed the other defendants. In such a situation, Zenith and Motorola would be entitled to an apportionment instruction. In Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Parrish, 58 S.W.3d 467 (Ky…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · September 30, 2021 · in the opinion
Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2021)
…supported by evidence that the defendant acted with "flagrant indifference" or "engaged in misrepresentation, deceit or concealment of a known fact with the intention of causing injury" to the plaintiff. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Golightly…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 7, 2023 · in the opinion
Williams v. Schneider Electric USA, Inc. (2023)
…of the trial court's suggestion that a jury could apportion work-related and non-work-related injuries, if appropriate. Id. at [\4]-5 (citing Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Parrish, 58 S.W.3d 467…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · February 14, 2007 · in the opinion
Fleischman v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2007)
…of limitations, asbestosis and mesothelioma were separate claims even though each was attributed to the same asbestos exposure. Id. at 120-21. In Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., recent…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005
Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)
…said he was exposed to asbestos insulation on pipes, furnaces, ovens and machinery while tearing out and installing equipment, and it claimed the owners were liable as premises owners. The owners argued that Kentucky's workers'…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)
…a Ford engineer. They indicated that assembly lines, ovens, steel components, and extensive conveyor systems were necessary and essential to the manufacture and production of motor vehicles and that the dismantling of old assembly lines and…