11 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion
Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)
In Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 326 Md. 107, 604 A.2d 47, cert. denied, 506 U.S. 871, 113 S.Ct. 204, 121 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992) (hereinafter Armstrong II), the Court of Appeals first…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion
Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…cause of the injuries, and (4) that the product was expected to and did reach the consumer without substantial change in its condition." Phipps, 363 A.2d at 958, quoted in Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)
…now to discuss the impact of Adams, Dehn, Pharmacia and Gourdine on a manufacturer's duty to warn in an asbestos case. Georgia-Pacific first cites Adams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 119 Md. App. 395 (1998)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)
…of punitive damages. This Court has previously granted Georgia-Pacific summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages in a similar asbestos action, Covington v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., No. GLR-12-461, 2014 WL 12661857…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)
…No. 162-35. The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin has recently rejected Dr. Frank's rephrasing in Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 211 F.Supp.3d 1196, 1207 (W.D. Wis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)
…evidence of exposure to the defendant's asbestos. See Reiter v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 8 A.3d 725, 729 (Md. 2010); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 602 A.2d 1182, 1184 (Md. 1992). \[33\] This evidence…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion
Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)
…Edgecombe, 384 Md. 606, 865 A.2d 603 (2005), and Adams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 119 Md.App. 395, 705 A.2d 58 (1998), Georgia Pacific contends that: (1) the existence of a duty is determined…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Pransky (2002)
…Inc., 283 Md. 296, 328, 389 A.2d 887, 906 (1978) (same); Owens-Corning v. Walatka, 125 Md.App. 313, 342, 725 A.2d 579, 593 (1999) (same). Because Lisa did not handle the joint compound…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)
…permissible to inform a jury that a co-defendant to the asbestos lawsuit had been dismissed when a remaining defendant "opens the door" by introducing evidence relating to the earlier presence of that now-dismissed party…