No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

25 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 1, 2005

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Hunter (2005)

    The Court of Special Appeals affirmed the Baltimore City judgment: it rejected Owens-Illinois's challenges to the evidence and to the consortium award, and rejected Ms. Hunter's cross-appeal challenging the remittitur and the…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 7, 1992

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Armstrong (1992)

    The Court of Appeals of Maryland affirmed the compensatory verdicts for workers Armstrong and Wood against Owens-Illinois, but reversed the punitive damages awards and remanded for new trials limited to punitive damages. A trial judge…

  3. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 29, 1998

    Adams v. Owens-Illinois (1998)

    Nine asbestos cases, brought by workers or their estates and families, were tried together in Baltimore City against many companies. The claimed diseases were laryngeal, lung and colon cancer, asbestosis, and mesothelioma. One claim was by Mary…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …s liability findings and compensatory awards for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois and Porter Hayden, but reversed the $1.5 million punitive damages award against Owens-Corning in the Scruggs case. A bystander's…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 25, 1999

    Owens Corning v. Walatka (1999)

    …noneconomic damages cap to the Walatka verdicts, ruling for Owens Corning and Owens-Illinois, and remanded to apply the cap to all claims; it affirmed the Adams judgments against Owens Corning, ruling for the Adams plaintiffs.…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 3, 1997

    Anchor Packing Co. v. Grimshaw (1997)

    …reversed the judgment against Hopeman Brothers. It otherwise affirmed the judgments for the plaintiffs against Anchor and Owens-Corning. The Maryland cap on noneconomic damages applies to asbestos wrongful death claims arising after October 1, 1994…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    The Court of Special Appeals reversed the punitive damages awards for the Knuckles estate against Eagle-Picher and Owens-Illinois and affirmed all other judgments for the plaintiffs against the manufacturer and installer defendants. A jury…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 2010

    Crane v. Linkus (2010)

    George Linkus, a Baltimore shipyard machinist, was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in 2005 and sued John Crane, Inc. and others. He had worked at the Key Highway shipyard from 1952 to 1959, overhauling valves and packing them with dry, powdery…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 10, 1992

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1992)

    …and it ordered a new trial on punitive damages against Owens-Illinois and Eagle-Picher. A nonmanufacturing supplier-installer of asbestos is held to a 'should have known' standard in a negligent failure-to-warn claim…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013

    Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)

    James Joyner, a 22-year Coast Guard veteran who had earlier worked as an electrician's assistant at the Charleston Navy Shipyard, was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in March 2012. He sued several asbestos product makers and others in Baltimore…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)

    In Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 326 Md. 107, 604 A.2d 47, cert. denied, 506 U.S. 871, 113 S.Ct. 204, 121 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992) (hereinafter Armstrong II), the Court of Appeals first…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · June 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Sawyer v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2017)

    …LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and Union Carbide Corporation; John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., f/k/a Crane Packing Company; Owens- Illinois Glass Co., f/k/a Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Foster Wheeler Corporation; Hopeman Brothers, Inc.; Universal Refractories Company…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · August 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Haney v. 3M Company (2015)

    …for Summary Judgment \[ECF No. 849\] is GRANTED. The Cross-Claim of Hopeman Brothers, Inc., Against Defendant Owens Illinois, Inc. \[ECF No. 687\] is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Judgment shall be entered by separate Order. SO ORDERED…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …cause of the injuries, and (4) that the product was expected to and did reach the consumer without substantial change in its condition." Phipps, 363 A.2d at 958, quoted in Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · January 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Sawyer v. Union Carbide Corporation (2018)

    …Co., Cross Defendant, represented by Cheri V. Koerner, Steptoe & Johnson LLP & Stephen Anthony Fennell, Steptoe and Johnson LLP. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., Cross Defendant, represented by Randolph L. Burns, The Burns Law Firm PC. Pecora Corporation…

  16. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 11, 1996 · in the opinion

    ACandS Inc. v. Asner (1996)

    …s conclusions, namely that the evidence relating to TLVs offered by the petitioners was properly excluded and that the evidence offered in support of punitive damages was sufficient under the test enunciated in Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · November 16, 2009 · in the opinion

    Csr, Limited v. Taylor (2009)

    …their claims in Australia strikes me as the antithesis of "fair play and substantial justice." Chief Judge Bell and Judge Raker have authorized me to state that they join this dissenting opinion. \[1\] In Owens-Illinois…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · April 29, 2019 · in the opinion

    Sawyer v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)

    …represented by William G. Minkin, Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos & James Steven Zavakos, Law Offices of Peter G Angelos. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., formerly known as, Defendant, represented by Randolph L. Burns, The Burns Law…

  19. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 27, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Asner (1995)

    …all of the other companies settled, became bankrupt, or were dismissed from the case. AC & S was dismissed from the Payne action. Appellants cross-claimed for contribution against Owens-Illinois, Inc., GAF, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · February 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Sroka v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)

    …Paul Sroka, as plaintiffs. ECF No. 90-3. \[2\] The Plaintiffs also sued Union Carbide Corporation; John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.; Owens-Illinois Glass Company; E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc.; Hampshire Industries, Inc.; Universal Refractories Company; J…