No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · April 25, 1989

    Anjeski v. Keene Bldg. & Development Co. (1989)

    The district court granted summary judgment to defendants Keene, Celotex and Owens-Illinois, ruling that plaintiff Irene Anjeski's sole product identification deposition could not support a jury finding that her husband was exposed to their…

  2. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · September 12, 1997 · in the opinion

    Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    …regarding exposure to other asbestos-containing products does not warrant reversal. I join in parts II and III of the opinion. \[1\] Testimony at trial established that Kaylo was manufactured by Owens-Illinois until approximately 1958…

  3. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 13, 1998 · in the opinion

    Beaudrie v. Anchor Packing Co. (1998)

    …Inc., John Johnson Company, Keene Corporation, M.H. Detrick Company, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Raymark Industries and Standard Fuel Engineering Company, Defendants, and Silicosis and Dust Disease Fund and Detroit…

  4. Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · July 25, 2007 · in the opinion

    In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court OF Appeals OF Texas (2007)

    …supra at 233. The court held that because there was no relationship between the defendant and the defendant's employee's wife, no duty could be imposed. In Adams v Owens-Illinois, Inc, 119 Md App…

  5. Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · January 25, 1988 · in the opinion

    Brisboy v. Fibreboard Corp. (1988)

    …1, 1983, Daniel Brisboy was named as the successor personal representative of the estate of Charles R. Rand. \[2\] The original complaint also named as defendants Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Owens-Illinois Corp., Nicolet, Inc., Johns…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 4, 1978

    Ins. Co. of No. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations (1978)

    …This rejected the manifestation theory urged by INA, Affiliated FM, Illinois National and Liberty Mutual. Under occurrence-based liability policies, asbestos-related bodily injury occurs when fibers injure lung tissue after exposure, not when disease manifests…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · January 14, 1987

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …applying Michigan law, rejected three. Alternative liability failed because not all possible suppliers, including Owens-Corning and Johns-Manville, were sued. Market share liability was unsuitable because asbestos products differ in harmfulness, and nothing showed the…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · August 18, 1988 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …defendants' motion for judgment is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. \[1\] Johns-Manville Corporation and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation. Plaintiff did not name Johns-Manville because it had filed for bankruptcy status. \[2\] Contra Abel v…

  9. Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · December 29, 1986 · in the opinion

    Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1986)

    …958-959; 275 SE2d 900 (1981) (cause of action accrues when, according to medical testimony, plaintiff was first harmed by asbestos); Neubauer v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp, 686 F2d 570, 577 (CA 7, 1982), cert den…