7 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Niedert v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2022)
…DELAWARE), GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC (NORTH CAROLINA), GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC, GOODYEAR CANADA, INC, GOULDS PUMPS LLC, ITT LLC., KEELER-DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC, PFIZER, INC. (PFIZER), THE GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, U.S…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 27, 2005 · in the opinion
Holdampf v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Matter of Nyc Asbestos Litig, 2005)
…C., Donald D. Evans, Arlington, Virginia, Ann W. Spragens and Robert J. Hurns, Des Plaines, Illinois, and Robin S. Conrad and Amar D. Sarwal, Washington, D.C., for Coalition for Litigation Justice, Inc., and others, amici…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 5, 2015 · in the opinion
Ricci v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
Grace & Co.-Conn), 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). Issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion
Holdampf v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2004)
…the defendants' motions for summary judgment, and the defendants based their appellate argument on the Widera rationale that an employer owes no duty of care to non-employees for injuries occurring off-premises (id. at 752)…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Kriz v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)
In opposition to Armstrong's motion, Plaintiff argues that a product manufacturer like Armstrong owes innocent persons injured from its defective product, like decedent, a clear duty to warn under New York law, especially in "take…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 2006
8th Jud Dist Asbestos Litig (2006)
…the New York Court of Appeals' duty analysis, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse for take-home asbestos exposure absent a relationship with her, and OSHA regulations create no private right of…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Aston v. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc. (2018)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …