No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

141 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 8

  1. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 28, 1997

    Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997)

    …new trial for Owens-Illinois. It held that the burden-shifting instruction was error but harmless, and that the tobacco company defense issue was controlled by Richards, so the plaintiffs' judgment against Owens-Illinois was not…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 17, 1995

    Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995)

    …upholding the jury's findings that Owens-Illinois's Kaylo insulation was defective and was 100 percent responsible, and holding that Owens-Illinois waived its claim to allocate fault to the Navy. A product such as…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 6, 2016

    Ney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2016)

    …at Bethlehem Steel from 1948 to 1953. A co-worker named only Owens-Illinois's Kaylo pipe covering and Quigley's Insulag spray as asbestos products at that site. Plaintiff sought documents and a corporate witness…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 20, 1990

    Johnson v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    …including compensatory and punitive damages, against Celotex and Owens-Illinois; one judge dissented as to punitive damages. A trial court may consolidate asbestos cases with common worksites and issues if it uses cautionary instructions and separate…

  5. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 4, 1996

    Nugent v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Inc. (1996)

    The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment on the jury verdict for Owens-Corning Fiberglas and ACandS, rejecting the widow's claims of trial error (one judge dissented as to the Hazard deposition). A trial…

  6. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · September 10, 1991

    Hagen v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

    …directing judgment for Owens-Illinois and remanding for a new trial against Fibreboard because the plaintiffs' proof of causation was insufficient. A plaintiff must show through expert testimony that each defendant's product was a substantial…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 30, 2002

    Hennegan v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co. (2002)

    James Hennegan worked from 1965 to 1968 as a deckhand and Jones Act seaman on derrick barges owned by Cooper/T. Smith. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 1997 and died in 1999. He sued, and after his death his wife continued the case individually…

  8. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · January 19, 1994 · in the opinion

    Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …products. From 1953-58 OCF distributed Kaylo, an asbestos-containing pipe covering and block insulation product manufactured by Owens-Illinois. In 1958 OCF began manufacturing and distributing Kaylo and continued to do so until late 1972…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · August 1, 1989 · in the opinion

    Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1989)

    …TEXTILE CORPORATION, PACOR, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., GARLOCK, INC., CERTAINTEED PRODUCTS CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, AND JOHN DOE, DEFENDANTS, AND OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC…

  10. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 22, 1998 · in the opinion

    Purcell v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1998)

    …The Saranac Lake documents consisted of correspondence between Owens-Illinois officials and Saranac doctors, various summaries, and a 1955 final report of that study.\[8\] Owens contends that the Saranac Lake documents were admitted erroneously because…

  11. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 8, 2001 · in the opinion

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …Babcock & Wilcox, Combustion Engineering, Fibreboard Corp., Garlock, Inc., Johns Manville, Owens Illinois, Rapid American, Rock Wool Manufacturing, Uniroyal, and UNR (UNARCO). This results in a total of 24 virile shares. We subtract two shares for Kelmell…

  12. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Daniels v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2019)

    …General Electric, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and Owens Illinois (herein "settled defendants")) on the jury verdict form. John Crane contends that under the Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act (Contribution Act) (740 ILCS 100/1 et seq. (West…

  13. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 2017 · in the opinion

    Startley v. Welco Mfg. Co. (2017)

    …in Illinois. See Elmore v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 673 S.W.2d 434, 437 (Mo. 1984). Applying the Townsend factors, and in view of the Ingersoll presumption, we hold that the trial court correctly applied Illinois…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)

    In Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 326 Md. 107, 604 A.2d 47, cert. denied, 506 U.S. 871, 113 S.Ct. 204, 121 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992) (hereinafter Armstrong II), the Court of Appeals first…

  15. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 22, 2022 · in the opinion

    Budd v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2022)

    …compound. Given the differences between smoking an addictive substance and using a particular product in the course of employment, we reject this contention. See Raney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 897 F.2d 94, 96 (2d Cir…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)

    …Karst & Von Oiste and George H. Kim for Plaintiff and Respondent. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION WILLHITE, Acting P.J. In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the California Supreme Court addressed the…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Ann Strobel v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)

    …25 Cal.4th at p. 850), which here is the preponderance of the evidence (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 965 (Rutherford)). "\On appeal "\[w\]e review a grant of summary judgment…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)

    …encompass the issue whether Whitmire had been sufficiently exposed to asbestos due to Bechtel's conduct to conclude that Bechtel asbestos was a "substantial factor" in causing Whitmire's mesothelioma. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., supra…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …sources, jury reasonably allocated 85 percent share of comparative fault to Union Carbide where it submitted no evidence detailing plaintiff's exposure from other sources\]; Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…

  20. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)

    …now to discuss the impact of Adams, Dehn, Pharmacia and Gourdine on a manufacturer's duty to warn in an asbestos case. Georgia-Pacific first cites Adams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 119 Md. App. 395 (1998)…