No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

78 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 4

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 1998

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    Evelyn Ruckstuhl and her husband Richard sued several companies in Louisiana state court. They alleged she was diagnosed with mesothelioma in March 1996 from asbestos exposure in two ways: dust on her husband's work clothes from the Baton Rouge…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 20, 1990

    Johnson v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    …including compensatory and punitive damages, against Celotex and Owens-Illinois; one judge dissented as to punitive damages. A trial court may consolidate asbestos cases with common worksites and issues if it uses cautionary instructions and separate…

  3. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 4, 1996

    Nugent v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Inc. (1996)

    The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment on the jury verdict for Owens-Corning Fiberglas and ACandS, rejecting the widow's claims of trial error (one judge dissented as to the Hazard deposition). A trial…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · April 13, 1999 · in the opinion

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …dissent. \[\\] Kimball, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3. \[1\] The other eight defendants are Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, The Babcock & Wilcox Company, Combustion Engineering, Inc., Rapid American…

  5. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · August 1, 1989 · in the opinion

    Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1989)

    …TEXTILE CORPORATION, PACOR, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., GARLOCK, INC., CERTAINTEED PRODUCTS CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, AND JOHN DOE, DEFENDANTS, AND OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC…

  6. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 22, 1998 · in the opinion

    Purcell v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1998)

    …The Saranac Lake documents consisted of correspondence between Owens-Illinois officials and Saranac doctors, various summaries, and a 1955 final report of that study.\[8\] Owens contends that the Saranac Lake documents were admitted erroneously because…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 8, 2001 · in the opinion

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …Babcock & Wilcox, Combustion Engineering, Fibreboard Corp., Garlock, Inc., Johns Manville, Owens Illinois, Rapid American, Rock Wool Manufacturing, Uniroyal, and UNR (UNARCO). This results in a total of 24 virile shares. We subtract two shares for Kelmell…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)

    In Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 326 Md. 107, 604 A.2d 47, cert. denied, 506 U.S. 871, 113 S.Ct. 204, 121 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992) (hereinafter Armstrong II), the Court of Appeals first…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)

    …encompass the issue whether Whitmire had been sufficiently exposed to asbestos due to Bechtel's conduct to conclude that Bechtel asbestos was a "substantial factor" in causing Whitmire's mesothelioma. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., supra…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …sources, jury reasonably allocated 85 percent share of comparative fault to Union Carbide where it submitted no evidence detailing plaintiff's exposure from other sources\]; Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion

    Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)

    …In so doing, appellants are not "expected to prove the scientifically unknown details of carcinogenesis, or trace the unknowable path of a given asbestos fiber." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976.…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

    …L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)

    …a substantial factor in causing Dr. Behshid's mesothelioma. This contention is not persuasive. Causation in asbestos cases In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the Supreme Court held that the…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 22, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON (2018)

    …already in possession of this deposition transcript. If they are not, it is available upon request. Plaintiff objects. Andrew Richardson Deposition taken 5/11/1987 Cannon v. Owens-Illinois, USDC, District of South Carolina, Cause No…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)

    …than industry can assimilate the knowledge and adopt it as a standard." ... The role of state of the art evidence under Maryland law in strict liability, failure to warn cases was explained in Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)

    …the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 30, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)

    …s analysis is "inconsistent" with two non-binding authorities: Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda County., 384 P.3d 284 (Cal. 2016) and Olivio v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 895 A.2d 1143 (N.J. 2006). (Mot…

  18. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · November 16, 2009 · in the opinion

    Csr, Limited v. Taylor (2009)

    …their claims in Australia strikes me as the antithesis of "fair play and substantial justice." Chief Judge Bell and Judge Raker have authorized me to state that they join this dissenting opinion. \[1\] In Owens-Illinois…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Turley v. Familian Corporation (2017)

    …factor in causing Webb's mesothelioma. (See Rutherford, supra, 16 Cal.4th at pp. 976-977;Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 476.)" (Webb, supra, 63 Cal.4th at p. 193…

  20. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)

    …a negligent failure to warn action." May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp., 446 Md. 1, 25 n.22 (2015) (citation omitted). In Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, supra, the Court noted that Professors Henderson and Twerski …