No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

85 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 5

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 20, 1990

    Johnson v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    …including compensatory and punitive damages, against Celotex and Owens-Illinois; one judge dissented as to punitive damages. A trial court may consolidate asbestos cases with common worksites and issues if it uses cautionary instructions and separate…

  2. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 4, 1996

    Nugent v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Inc. (1996)

    The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment on the jury verdict for Owens-Corning Fiberglas and ACandS, rejecting the widow's claims of trial error (one judge dissented as to the Hazard deposition). A trial…

  3. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · September 10, 1991

    Hagen v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

    …directing judgment for Owens-Illinois and remanding for a new trial against Fibreboard because the plaintiffs' proof of causation was insufficient. A plaintiff must show through expert testimony that each defendant's product was a substantial…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · August 1, 1989 · in the opinion

    Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1989)

    …TEXTILE CORPORATION, PACOR, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., GARLOCK, INC., CERTAINTEED PRODUCTS CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, AND JOHN DOE, DEFENDANTS, AND OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC…

  5. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 22, 1998 · in the opinion

    Purcell v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1998)

    …The Saranac Lake documents consisted of correspondence between Owens-Illinois officials and Saranac doctors, various summaries, and a 1955 final report of that study.\[8\] Owens contends that the Saranac Lake documents were admitted erroneously because…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 8, 2001 · in the opinion

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …Babcock & Wilcox, Combustion Engineering, Fibreboard Corp., Garlock, Inc., Johns Manville, Owens Illinois, Rapid American, Rock Wool Manufacturing, Uniroyal, and UNR (UNARCO). This results in a total of 24 virile shares. We subtract two shares for Kelmell…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · February 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Glein v. Boeing Company (2011)

    … OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; PNEUMO ABEX LLC; PRATT & WHITNEY ENGINE SERVICES, INC.; UNION CARBIDE CORP.; UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Defendants. Civil No. 11-47-GPM. February 8, 2011. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 25, 2010 · in the opinion

    Glein v. Boeing Company (2010)

    …Inc.; Lockheed Martin Corp.; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.; North American Aviation Development, LLC; Northrop Grumman Systems Corp.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Pneumo Abex, LLC; Pratt & Whitney Engine Services, Inc.; and Union Carbide Corp. \[2\] The Court notes…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)

    …encompass the issue whether Whitmire had been sufficiently exposed to asbestos due to Bechtel's conduct to conclude that Bechtel asbestos was a "substantial factor" in causing Whitmire's mesothelioma. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., supra…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …sources, jury reasonably allocated 85 percent share of comparative fault to Union Carbide where it submitted no evidence detailing plaintiff's exposure from other sources\]; Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 1984 · in the opinion

    Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

    …for plaintiff-appellee. [\464] Robert S. Rooth, New Orleans, La., for amicus curiae Owens-Illinois, Inc. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges. POLITZ, Circuit Judge: This Louisiana diversity case occasions an examination of…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion

    Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)

    …In so doing, appellants are not "expected to prove the scientifically unknown details of carcinogenesis, or trace the unknowable path of a given asbestos fiber." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976.…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

    …L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia · April 20, 2009 · in the opinion

    Hamrick v. A & I Company (2009)

    …LEARJET, INC. and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION f/k/a Martin Marietta Corporation and MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY a/k/a Metropolitan Insurance Company and NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION and OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Gillen v. Boeing Company (2014)

    …California law and the extent to which foreseeability is considered in the California court's analysis.\[11\] Second, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., while recognizing a duty under certain circumstances…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)

    …a substantial factor in causing Dr. Behshid's mesothelioma. This contention is not persuasive. Causation in asbestos cases In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the Supreme Court held that the…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)

    …than industry can assimilate the knowledge and adopt it as a standard." ... The role of state of the art evidence under Maryland law in strict liability, failure to warn cases was explained in Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)

    …the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 30, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)

    …s analysis is "inconsistent" with two non-binding authorities: Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda County., 384 P.3d 284 (Cal. 2016) and Olivio v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 895 A.2d 1143 (N.J. 2006). (Mot…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · October 27, 2015 · in the opinion

    Sequira v. 3M Company (2015)

    …exposure. Sequira didn't offer competent expert evidence showing that the asbestos from the Pratt & Whitney engines was a "substantial factor" in causing his mesothelioma. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203, 1219…