125 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 7
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009
Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2009)
…Cork, DAP, Pneumo Abex and Owens-Illinois, ruling against Jon and Lois Burger. A plaintiff opposing summary judgment in an asbestos case must produce evidence that he inhaled asbestos fibers from the particular defendant's product…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 1998
Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)
Evelyn Ruckstuhl and her husband Richard sued several companies in Louisiana state court. They alleged she was diagnosed with mesothelioma in March 1996 from asbestos exposure in two ways: dust on her husband's work clothes from the Baton Rouge…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · December 19, 2019
Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2019)
The Illinois Supreme Court reversed the appellate court's reinstatement of the civil conspiracy claims against Owens-Illinois and Pneumo Abex and remanded to the appellate court to review the circuit court's summary judgment for…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021
Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)
Affirmed the trial court's summary judgment for Pneumo Abex and Owens-Illinois on the Joneses' civil conspiracy claims, after the Illinois Supreme Court remanded for a proper analysis. A civil conspiracy based on circumstantial evidence…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003
Chavers v. Gatke Corp. (2003)
…trial record also showed asbestos exposure during Navy service from 1958 to 1962. All defendants but Gatke Corporation and Owens-Illinois settled before trial. The plaintiffs admitted they had no evidence he used or worked around…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · July 16, 2020
Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2020)
Charles Corley and his wife Myra sued dozens of companies that allegedly supplied asbestos-containing products that caused his malignant mesothelioma. The opinion says he used the products in the Navy and later as a self-employed mechanic and…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · April 13, 1999 · in the opinion
Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)
…dissent. \[\\] Kimball, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3. \[1\] The other eight defendants are Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, The Babcock & Wilcox Company, Combustion Engineering, Inc., Rapid American…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 10, 2016 · in the opinion
Neumann v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC (2016)
…v. Breeding Insulation, Inc., 266 S.W.3d 347, 359-75 (Tenn.2008) (imposing duty on father's employer), and Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J. 394, 402-05, 895 A.2d 1143, 1147…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion
Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)
In Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 326 Md. 107, 604 A.2d 47, cert. denied, 506 U.S. 871, 113 S.Ct. 204, 121 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992) (hereinafter Armstrong II), the Court of Appeals first…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion
Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)
…Karst & Von Oiste and George H. Kim for Plaintiff and Respondent. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION WILLHITE, Acting P.J. In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the California Supreme Court addressed the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2015 · in the opinion
Sherman v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2015)
…and a reasonable medical probability that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a substantial factor in bringing about the risk of the alleged injuries. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)
…sources, jury reasonably allocated 85 percent share of comparative fault to Union Carbide where it submitted no evidence detailing plaintiff's exposure from other sources\]; Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)
…L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Estate OF Brust v. Acf Industries, LLC (2015)
…established by this record are so few and so limited that they simply fail to meet the "frequency, regularity, and proximity" test. That test was satisfied in Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J. 394…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON (2018)
…already in possession of this deposition transcript. If they are not, it is available upon request. Plaintiff objects. Andrew Richardson Deposition taken 5/11/1987 Cannon v. Owens-Illinois, USDC, District of South Carolina, Cause No…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion
Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)
…line separating these two incommensurate paradigms. Some guidance regarding the application of Sindell principles in asbestos-related tort litigation is furnished by the high court's opinion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion
Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)
…than industry can assimilate the knowledge and adopt it as a standard." ... The role of state of the art evidence under Maryland law in strict liability, failure to warn cases was explained in Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)
…the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)
…subd. (a); Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 958 (Rutherford).) "\[I\]f supported by the evidence," a jury must apportion fault against parties and nonparties found responsible for the plaintiff's injury…