No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

56 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 3

  1. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 28, 1997

    Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997)

    …new trial for Owens-Illinois. It held that the burden-shifting instruction was error but harmless, and that the tobacco company defense issue was controlled by Richards, so the plaintiffs' judgment against Owens-Illinois was not…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 17, 1995

    Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995)

    …upholding the jury's findings that Owens-Illinois's Kaylo insulation was defective and was 100 percent responsible, and holding that Owens-Illinois waived its claim to allocate fault to the Navy. A product such as…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 6, 2016

    Ney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2016)

    …at Bethlehem Steel from 1948 to 1953. A co-worker named only Owens-Illinois's Kaylo pipe covering and Quigley's Insulag spray as asbestos products at that site. Plaintiff sought documents and a corporate witness…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998

    Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)

    The court affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Kaylo insulation) and Rock Wool (One Shot cement), reversed the judgments against Garlock, A.W. Chesterton and Flexitallic, affirmed the judgments against Abadie…

  5. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · September 10, 1991

    Hagen v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

    …directing judgment for Owens-Illinois and remanding for a new trial against Fibreboard because the plaintiffs' proof of causation was insufficient. A plaintiff must show through expert testimony that each defendant's product was a substantial…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 30, 2002

    Hennegan v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co. (2002)

    James Hennegan worked from 1965 to 1968 as a deckhand and Jones Act seaman on derrick barges owned by Cooper/T. Smith. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 1997 and died in 1999. He sued, and after his death his wife continued the case individually…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …used safely, while Kaylo could be used safely. Moreover, in response to discovery requests, Beckmann admitted at least possible exposure to products manufactured by Johns-Manville, Owens-Illinois, Pittsburgh Corning, and W.R. Grace. Finally, none…

  8. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · January 19, 1994 · in the opinion

    Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …products. From 1953-58 OCF distributed Kaylo, an asbestos-containing pipe covering and block insulation product manufactured by Owens-Illinois. In 1958 OCF began manufacturing and distributing Kaylo and continued to do so until late 1972…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Daniels v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2019)

    …General Electric, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and Owens Illinois (herein "settled defendants")) on the jury verdict form. John Crane contends that under the Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act (Contribution Act) (740 ILCS 100/1 et seq. (West…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)

    In Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 326 Md. 107, 604 A.2d 47, cert. denied, 506 U.S. 871, 113 S.Ct. 204, 121 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992) (hereinafter Armstrong II), the Court of Appeals first…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · April 16, 1990 · in the opinion

    Simpson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1990)

    …SIMPSON, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of David Simpson, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Owens-Illinois, Inc., The Celotex Corporation, Intergy, Inc.…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion

    Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)

    …In so doing, appellants are not "expected to prove the scientifically unknown details of carcinogenesis, or trace the unknowable path of a given asbestos fiber." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976.…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Strickland v. Union Carbide Corp. (2013)

    …Zogarts (1975) 14 Cal.3d 104, 110.) Law Governing Proof of Causation in Asbestos Cases Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) sets forth the controlling standard for proving causation in an…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    …of punitive damages. This Court has previously granted Georgia-Pacific summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages in a similar asbestos action, Covington v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., No. GLR-12-461, 2014 WL 12661857…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)

    …on asbestos causation. The trial court—noting that the added language was taken from key asbestos causation cases—denied their motion for new trial. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    …No. 162-35. The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin has recently rejected Dr. Frank's rephrasing in Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 211 F.Supp.3d 1196, 1207 (W.D. Wis…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 22, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON (2018)

    …already in possession of this deposition transcript. If they are not, it is available upon request. Plaintiff objects. Andrew Richardson Deposition taken 5/11/1987 Cannon v. Owens-Illinois, USDC, District of South Carolina, Cause No…

  18. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · November 16, 2009 · in the opinion

    Csr, Limited v. Taylor (2009)

    …their claims in Australia strikes me as the antithesis of "fair play and substantial justice." Chief Judge Bell and Judge Raker have authorized me to state that they join this dissenting opinion. \[1\] In Owens-Illinois…

  19. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · October 24, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rich v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2012)

    …to refutation on cross-examination). This does not render the prejudicial portion of Kirk's deposition dealing with Kaiser Gypsum's products admissible. See Murphy v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 779 F.2d 340, 344 (6th Cir…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …not Bakkie's burden, to prove fault attributable to others. (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 478-479.) Union Carbide did present such evidence and successfully convinced the jury that it…