135 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 7
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009
Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2009)
…Cork, DAP, Pneumo Abex and Owens-Illinois, ruling against Jon and Lois Burger. A plaintiff opposing summary judgment in an asbestos case must produce evidence that he inhaled asbestos fibers from the particular defendant's product…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990
Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)
Six longtime workers at the E.I. du Pont plant in Clinton, Iowa, and their wives sued makers of asbestos insulation products. The workers said they were exposed through insulation on pipes and boilers, and in some cases through cleaning out machine…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · December 19, 2019
Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2019)
The Illinois Supreme Court reversed the appellate court's reinstatement of the civil conspiracy claims against Owens-Illinois and Pneumo Abex and remanded to the appellate court to review the circuit court's summary judgment for…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021
Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)
Affirmed the trial court's summary judgment for Pneumo Abex and Owens-Illinois on the Joneses' civil conspiracy claims, after the Illinois Supreme Court remanded for a proper analysis. A civil conspiracy based on circumstantial evidence…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003
Chavers v. Gatke Corp. (2003)
…trial record also showed asbestos exposure during Navy service from 1958 to 1962. All defendants but Gatke Corporation and Owens-Illinois settled before trial. The plaintiffs admitted they had no evidence he used or worked around…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · June 2, 1993
Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co. (1993)
The Eighth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for all defendants (Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois, Fibreboard, Keene, Anchor, Chesterton, Garlock, John Crane, Rexnord and Georgia Talc) against the ten Mohawk tire plant workers, because the workers lacked sufficient…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 4, 2015
Brady v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
Plaintiffs asked the New York County Supreme Court to consolidate thirteen asbestos cases for joint trial in two groups. All but one of the plaintiffs had lung cancer. Miceli and Ward had mesothelioma. Most had died, and Miller and Morgan were…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 30, 2002
Hennegan v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co. (2002)
James Hennegan worked from 1965 to 1968 as a deckhand and Jones Act seaman on derrick barges owned by Cooper/T. Smith. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 1997 and died in 1999. He sued, and after his death his wife continued the case individually…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Smith v. Illinois Central R. Co. (2015)
…LLC; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Honeywell International, Inc.; Railroad Friction Products Corporation; and Illinois Central. As of October 2013, the only defendant remaining in this case was Illinois Central. ¶ 4 On October 1…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 10, 2016 · in the opinion
Neumann v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC (2016)
…v. Breeding Insulation, Inc., 266 S.W.3d 347, 359-75 (Tenn.2008) (imposing duty on father's employer), and Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J. 394, 402-05, 895 A.2d 1143, 1147…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion
Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)
In Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 326 Md. 107, 604 A.2d 47, cert. denied, 506 U.S. 871, 113 S.Ct. 204, 121 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992) (hereinafter Armstrong II), the Court of Appeals first…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion
Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)
…Karst & Von Oiste and George H. Kim for Plaintiff and Respondent. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION WILLHITE, Acting P.J. In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the California Supreme Court addressed the…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · November 19, 2013 · in the opinion
Lemberger v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)
…LEMBERGER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, BENDIX COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS, LLC, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, OWENS ILLINOIS, INC., WAHL REFRACTORIES, INC., PRICE VIKING, HENNES SERVICES, INC., ZIEN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2015 · in the opinion
Sherman v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2015)
…and a reasonable medical probability that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a substantial factor in bringing about the risk of the alleged injuries. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)
…L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 2014 · in the opinion
Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda County (2014)
…due to exposure to friable asbestos. Whether exposure from any particular source was a substantial factor in causing a plaintiff's injury may often be questionable (see Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 3, 2009 · in the opinion
Kurns v. AW Chesterton (2009)
…date of the Minot, North Dakota, derailment. \[11\] In furtherance of the FRSA Amendment argument, plaintiff also relies on DeFrancisco v. Owens-Illinois, Docket No. CAM-L-1127-05 (N.J. Super. Ct., Cam den Cty…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Estate OF Brust v. Acf Industries, LLC (2015)
…established by this record are so few and so limited that they simply fail to meet the "frequency, regularity, and proximity" test. That test was satisfied in Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J. 394…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion
Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)
…line separating these two incommensurate paradigms. Some guidance regarding the application of Sindell principles in asbestos-related tort litigation is furnished by the high court's opinion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…