7 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 29, 1998
Adams v. Owens-Illinois (1998)
Nine asbestos cases, brought by workers or their estates and families, were tried together in Baltimore City against many companies. The claimed diseases were laryngeal, lung and colon cancer, asbestosis, and mesothelioma. One claim was by Mary…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 31, 2007
Penn v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2007)
Eight Ohio workers or their estates sued many companies, claiming asbestos-related diseases from their employment. Hubbard, Siegel and Price had colon cancer; Williams had laryngeal cancer; Ward had lung cancer; Roth, Penn and Harrison had…
-
Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · March 6, 1997 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Henkel (1997)
…this case, and that courts in other jurisdictions have relied on Dartez to sustain the admission of the evidence which has been challenged in this case. See, e.g., Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 325 Md…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 14, 1999
Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)
The Superior Court affirmed the trial court's denial of Owens-Corning's motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial, leaving the plaintiffs' verdicts and the judgment entered for them in place. Where…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)
… 1447(d) (emphasis added). We construed that language [\388] in Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124 (3d Cir.1998), where we held that "section 1447(d) prohibits review of remand orders \whether…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 2, 2022 · in the opinion
Nuckols v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2022)
…nevertheless, that there existed factual disputes regarding when plaintiff first had a duty to investigate whether his exposure to diesel exhaust may have been a cause of his cancers. See also Owens v. Union Pacific RR…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2014
Haver v. BNSF Railway Co. (2014)
…Ford Motor Co., a premises owner owes no duty of care to family members of workers who are secondarily exposed to asbestos off the premises, whether the worker was employed by the owner or by a…