13 results for “Reaction Department”
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995 · in the opinion
Ripa v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)
…Vorwald to Hazard suggesting that Kaylo produced an asbestosis-like reaction in the lungs and that "every precaution should be taken to minimize exposure of industrial employees." (9) The final confidential January 1952 project report concluding…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion
Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2023)
…at 32-33). Plaintiff also asserts that the report "kicked off a flurry of reaction" at J&J, including a team of lawyers and executives spending days working on a response and an $8 million increase…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 27, 2020 · in the opinion
In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products (2020)
…925 (2009). The study concluded that "\[t\]alc has unfavorable effects on the female genital system," but that "this effect is in the form of foreign body reaction and infection, rather than being neoplastic." Id. \[47…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · July 31, 1986 · in the opinion
Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…notion that certain activities that create danger must, regardless of their reasonableness, "pay \[their\] own way in the event \[they\] actually cause\[\] damage\[\] to others." Berg v. Reaction Motors Div., 37 N.J. 396, 410 (1962)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 31, 1985 · in the opinion
Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec v. Am. Home Assur. Co. (1985)
…fibers, once inhaled, remain in place in the lung, causing a tissue reaction that is slowly progressive and apparently irreversible. Even if no additional asbestos fibers are inhaled, tissue changes may continue undetected for decades. By…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · November 15, 1994 · in the opinion
Becker v. Baron Bros. (1994)
…motions, the court stated that its basis for ruling that asbestos products without warnings are defective as a matter of law was "pretty much \ \ \ judicial gut reaction and instinct as well as Beshada." On appeal, the…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995 · in the opinion
Schiavo v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)
…any error, as opposed to the jurors' normal reaction to a graphic exposure to the effects of advanced mesothelioma. While there is no New Jersey case specifically authorizing a "day in the life" tape, such tapes…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…55. Furthermore, Defendants contend that Plaintiff cannot establish that the Class Members' alleged losses are attributable to the alleged misrepresentations rather than "overall market trends and market reaction to litigation risk." Id. at 58-60. For…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 25, 2021 · in the opinion
In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (2021)
…does not assist in the defense of the referenced litigation and was primarily designed to minimize the public's potential reaction to an adverse verdict. Tab 95 — P2\_JNJTALC\_000011141 This is an email with an…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 29, 2018 · in the opinion
Rowe v. Bell & Gossett Company (2018)
…of the front vehicle in a four-vehicle collision, sued the driver of the rear-most car, Hodes, who had "caus\[ed\] a chain reaction collision" leading to her injury. 363 N.J. Super. at 601…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 29, 1993 · in the opinion
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co. (1993)
…produce significant pulmonary damage when inhaled. Instead, Vorwald reported that a "definite indication of tissue reaction appeared in the lungs of animals inhaling [\471] Kaylo dust." Moreover, prolonged exposure to the product, more than 30 months…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 20, 2016
Seymoure v. AO Smith Water Products Company (2016)
…s counsel planned to use the records in other litigation, and the order set no limit on that. The court remanded for a protective order requiring redaction and limiting use to this case unless employees consent.
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 15, 2008 · in the opinion
Sarkozy v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2008)
…Riegel even beyond the claimed date of 1977. The judge did not allow redaction of the sales strategy information because "there's an inference to be made from that, that they were pushing the asbestos felt…