6 results for “Reaction Department”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 29, 2018 · in the opinion
Mehnert v. Agilent Technologies, Inc. (2018)
…and products. (Docket No. 1-1 ¶ 8).\[3\] Plaintiff Harald Mehnert worked on Mass Spectrometers at the U.S. Geological Survey ("U.S.G.S") Department in Denver, Colorado between 1959 and 1995. (Docket No. 1…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 5, 2013 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2013)
…you must determine the number of years \[D\]ecedent would have lived had \[he\] not died as a result of this injury. According to statistics compiled by the United States Department of Health and Human Services…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 15, 2009 · in the opinion
Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)
…become imbedded in lung or other tissue. The reaction consists of the body "walling off" the foreign matter with fibrous cells such that it eventually produces scar-like tissue which builds up over many years. \ \ \ Pulmonary…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Larson v. Georgia Pacific (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2010)
…Mem. Op., doc. no. 73, at 7.) These articles include, but are not limited to: Chrysotile asbestos inhalation in rats: deposition pattern and reaction of alveolar epithelium, and pulmonary macrophages. (doc. no. 19-2, at p…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 14, 1999 · in the opinion
Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)
…supra 671 A.2d at 1155 (reasoning that plaintiff injured by adverse reaction to prescription drug could not demonstrate causal connection between injury and manufacturer's allegedly deficient warning because plaintiff's treating physician testified that…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Steiner v. Hollingsworth & Vose Company (2018)
…is asked to assert jurisdiction). \[3\] Plaintiff does not explain the details of this log, but redaction of the claimants' names would be anticipated. \[4\] See supra at note 3. \[5\] We note that the trial…