No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

13 results for “Reaction Department”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 16, 2003

    Matter of O'malley v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York (2003)

    …Third Department, reversed. It noted that nobody disputed the roughly 25 years of asbestos exposure at work. Gould relied on that exposure and on features in the medical records, including a tissue reaction in the biopsy…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

    …goal of installing brakes weakens the inference that Phillips reaction to a warning on the boxes of Bendix brakes would have been the same as his reaction to the warning on cigarette packaging when he started…

  3. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …929] husband's personality or ability to engage in all the intangible associations which marriage brings; he too suffers the effect of the change, if only in reaction to his wife's unhappiness. Today, at least…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)

    …Id. Therefore, he did not anticipate any unfavorable reaction. Id. He further indicated that he would be unable to attend the meeting at Johns-Manville and requested that Brown represent American Brake Shoe Company in connection…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …You mix them together. That starts the curing. That starts the chemical reaction for it to solidify. And we know that Mr. Bakkie was around the nitrogen gas that topped off the barrels of OPM because…

  6. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · September 16, 2019 · in the opinion

    Palmer v. Walker Jamar Company (2019)

    …district court noted, appellate courts have previously determined legislative amendments as clarifications when there is a "prompt reaction to a court's construction of a statute" with which the legislature disagrees. In Hoben v. City of…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …In other words, the study found that a person could be exposed to a cumulative annual exposure of up to between 208 and 415 fibers per cubic centimeter before experiencing an observable adverse reaction. (See June…

  8. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · November 15, 1994 · in the opinion

    Becker v. Baron Bros. (1994)

    …motions, the court stated that its basis for ruling that asbestos products without warnings are defective as a matter of law was "pretty much \ \ \ judicial gut reaction and instinct as well as Beshada." On appeal, the…

  9. Court case · Utah Supreme Court · November 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Boynton v. Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC (2021)

    …and thereby injures another. In Jeffs, we found it foreseeable that negligently prescribing medications to a patient might result in the patient then injuring someone else in situations where the medications cause a psychotic reaction. Id. …

  10. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 29, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rowe v. Bell & Gossett Company (2018)

    …of the front vehicle in a four-vehicle collision, sued the driver of the rear-most car, Hodes, who had "caus\[ed\] a chain reaction collision" leading to her injury. 363 N.J. Super. at 601…

  11. Court case · Vermont Supreme Court · May 10, 2024 · in the opinion

    Carpin v. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (2024)

    …. mesothelioma." He also corroborated that exposure to "asbestos fibers set up an inflammatory reaction" that leads to the disease, but ultimately it is the "asbestos that the patient breathes that is the cause of the disease…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 22, 2000 · in the opinion

    Lonasco v. A-Best Products Co. (2000)

    …obesity, asthma, emphysema and allergic reactions. All three appellant-husbands smoked cigarettes at some point in their lives and the record reflects that appellant Watkins is overweight and suffers from heart problems. Taylor, 666 A.2d…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …something beyond asbestosis, and with asbestosis, you see scarring not seen with the other forms. With the scarring and other complications of asbestos, particularly pleural reactions, come a greater risk of developing cancer. Also, while age…