20 results for “Reaction Department”
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 16, 2011 · in the opinion
Gordon v. Dana Companies (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)
…because "you didn't just use off-brand parts on that type of equipment. That's something that we as a maintenance department did not — I mean, they didn't want any cut-rate parts."\[10\…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)
…goal of installing brakes weakens the inference that Phillips reaction to a warning on the boxes of Bendix brakes would have been the same as his reaction to the warning on cigarette packaging when he started…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)
…929] husband's personality or ability to engage in all the intangible associations which marriage brings; he too suffers the effect of the change, if only in reaction to his wife's unhappiness. Today, at least…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)
…Id. Therefore, he did not anticipate any unfavorable reaction. Id. He further indicated that he would be unable to attend the meeting at Johns-Manville and requested that Brown represent American Brake Shoe Company in connection…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion
Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)
…You mix them together. That starts the curing. That starts the chemical reaction for it to solidify. And we know that Mr. Bakkie was around the nitrogen gas that topped off the barrels of OPM because…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · September 16, 2019 · in the opinion
Palmer v. Walker Jamar Company (2019)
…district court noted, appellate courts have previously determined legislative amendments as clarifications when there is a "prompt reaction to a court's construction of a statute" with which the legislature disagrees. In Hoben v. City of…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 14, 1999 · in the opinion
Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)
…supra 671 A.2d at 1155 (reasoning that plaintiff injured by adverse reaction to prescription drug could not demonstrate causal connection between injury and manufacturer's allegedly deficient warning because plaintiff's treating physician testified that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…In other words, the study found that a person could be exposed to a cumulative annual exposure of up to between 208 and 415 fibers per cubic centimeter before experiencing an observable adverse reaction. (See June…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · November 15, 1994 · in the opinion
Becker v. Baron Bros. (1994)
…motions, the court stated that its basis for ruling that asbestos products without warnings are defective as a matter of law was "pretty much \ \ \ judicial gut reaction and instinct as well as Beshada." On appeal, the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 26, 2024 · in the opinion
Smargisso v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…the testimony is not unfairly prejudicial or confusing. Warren is free to cross-examine Orton at trial about his initial reaction when asked about Warren by Warren's counsel, as compared to his later answers when…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2008 · in the opinion
Clemmer v. John Crane, Inc. (2008)
…trial by video deposition because he was too ill to travel. The record established that Clemmer had recently undergone a long course of chemotherapy and had suffered a severe allergic reaction. At the time of trial…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · August 18, 1997 · in the opinion
Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)
…or inhalation of asbestos fibers, because many who are exposed will never suffer a compensable injury. Neither would a nondetrimental physiological reaction to asbestos exposure constitute accrual. On the other hand, under this definition a cause…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 21, 2002 · in the opinion
Ballard v. Armstrong World Indus. (Matter of Seventh Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 2002)
…substantially the same questions of fact, as happens when large numbers of plaintiffs allege that they have developed similar illnesses in reaction to a particular toxic substance \ \ \ In such circumstances, consolidation permits the federal court to…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 29, 2018 · in the opinion
Rowe v. Bell & Gossett Company (2018)
…of the front vehicle in a four-vehicle collision, sued the driver of the rear-most car, Hodes, who had "caus\[ed\] a chain reaction collision" leading to her injury. 363 N.J. Super. at 601…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 11, 1994 · in the opinion
DiDio v. Philadelphia Asbestos Corp. (1994)
…565a-566a, 571a-575a. James Didio testified that he suffers great anxiety as a result of his diagnosis and described his initial reaction to the diagnosis of his conditions as devastation. N.T. 9/20/91…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
Voelker v. John Crane (Matter of Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…pounds. Mr. Voelker had a bad reaction to the second round of chemotherapy and after his return home, he "spiked" a fever which required a hospital stay of ten days as the doctors tried various antibiotics…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…are not stricken (and motions to strike should not be filed in federal court) as a kneejerk reaction whenever a litigant is unhappy with either the contents of an exhibit or the other side's arguments…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. (2023)
…promptly meet and confer to determine what, if any, portions of this Memorandum Opinion & Order warrant redaction. By no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall file a Joint…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion
Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)
…something beyond asbestosis, and with asbestosis, you see scarring not seen with the other forms. With the scarring and other complications of asbestos, particularly pleural reactions, come a greater risk of developing cancer. Also, while age…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion
Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)
…excessive cigarette smoking, heart disease, obesity, asthma, emphysema and allergic reactions. 1171 Id., at 687 n. 2. The condition the majority herein describes as compensable injury is "shortness of breath." Majority Op., at 1164. Despite Simmons…