10 results for “Reaction Department”
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · January 28, 2003 · in the opinion
Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc. (2003)
Pier explained that plaintiffs' theory is based on the "no threshold dose response model" utilized by the United States Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which indicates that there is no level…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 8, 1982 · in the opinion
White v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)
…June 1948 until June 1980). During those years he worked in various departments of Johns-Manville including the transite pipe plant where he was exposed to asbestos fibers and silica, the asbestos shingle plant where he…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994 · in the opinion
Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)
Flintkote's argument that this procedure provides a double recovery for inflation was rejected after thorough attention by the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, Fourth Department, in Brown v. State, 184 A.D…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)
…goal of installing brakes weakens the inference that Phillips reaction to a warning on the boxes of Bendix brakes would have been the same as his reaction to the warning on cigarette packaging when he started…
-
Court case · Nebraska Supreme Court · June 1, 2007 · in the opinion
Olivotto v. DeMarco Bros. Co. (2007)
…on October 9, 1998, when she suffered a reaction to latex that required her to seek emergency medical treatment. She had noticed symptoms later associated with an allergy to latex in the 1980's, but the…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 20, 1990 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Celotex Corp. (1990)
…test. I imagine you had some reaction to what he said to you. THE WITNESS: He just said he seen \[sic\] some spots on the X-ray. THE COURT: Did you react to that or no…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · November 2, 2016 · in the opinion
Pisano v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…9-1-29. The Rhode Island Legislature enacted § 9-1-29 in reaction to the elimination of the doctrine of privity in order to shield contractors, installers, and engineers from liability after a certain number of…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 4, 1996 · in the opinion
Nugent v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Inc. (1996)
…During the 30 to 36 months period, however, definite indication of tissue reaction [\928] appeared in the lungs of animals inhaling Kaylo dust and therefore, I regret to say, our tentative conclusion quoted above must be…
-
Court case · West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals · November 15, 1996 · in the opinion
Marlin v. Bill Rich Const., Inc. (1996)
…at 166 (citations omitted). In addition, the Court observed that "\[t\]he reasonableness of the plaintiff's reaction to the event will normally be a jury question." Id. at 491, 425 S.E.2d at 167…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion
Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)
…something beyond asbestosis, and with asbestosis, you see scarring not seen with the other forms. With the scarring and other complications of asbestos, particularly pleural reactions, come a greater risk of developing cancer. Also, while age…