No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “Reaction Department”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 16, 2003

    Matter of O'malley v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York (2003)

    …Third Department, reversed. It noted that nobody disputed the roughly 25 years of asbestos exposure at work. Gould relied on that exposure and on features in the medical records, including a tissue reaction in the biopsy…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995 · in the opinion

    Ripa v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    …Vorwald to Hazard suggesting that Kaylo produced an asbestosis-like reaction in the lungs and that "every precaution should be taken to minimize exposure of industrial employees." (9) The final confidential January 1952 project report concluding…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · November 18, 1993 · in the opinion

    Srite v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1993)

    …in physical pain. Mr. Ben had been employed at the Petrotex Refinery in the labor department as an insulator. He worked on a daily basis as a sandblaster throughout his tenure at Petrotex, from 1958 until…

  4. Medical study · Medical research · 1988

    Railroad workers with pleural plaques: II. Small airway dysfunction among asbestos-exposed workers

    …groups the VTG:TLC ratio was elevated compared with controls. Increased VTG is a sign of small airways dysfunction. In asbestos-exposed subjects, it might be caused by an early peribronchial reaction to inhaled asbestos fibers.

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 21, 1985 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)

    …and evokes the strongest of emotions. This prejudice must be coupled with the lack of effectiveness of any limiting instruction to eliminate the emotional reaction from the minds of the jury. Looking just at the first…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2008 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. John Crane, Inc. (2008)

    …trial by video deposition because he was too ill to travel. The record established that Clemmer had recently undergone a long course of chemotherapy and had suffered a severe allergic reaction. At the time of trial…

  7. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · February 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Oakes EX rel. Hagan (2018)

    …the Supreme Court noted that a setoff had occurred in Ayers, and there was no negative reaction or treatment of the setoff in the opinion. According to Ayers: "After reduction for three claimants' comparative negligence from…

  8. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1997 · in the opinion

    Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley (1997)

    …reaction to an increased risk of dying. An external circumstance—exposure—makes some emotional distress more likely. But how can one determine from the external circumstance of exposure whether, or when, a claimed strong emotional reaction…

  9. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · March 10, 2003 · in the opinion

    Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Ayers (2003)

    …See id., at 433. The distress the employee alleged, including his emotional reaction to an incremental, increased risk of dying from cancer, was beyond the ability of a jury to evaluate with precision, heightening the danger…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …are not stricken (and motions to strike should not be filed in federal court) as a kneejerk reaction whenever a litigant is unhappy with either the contents of an exhibit or the other side's arguments…

  11. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 15, 2008 · in the opinion

    Sarkozy v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2008)

    …Riegel even beyond the claimed date of 1977. The judge did not allow redaction of the sales strategy information because "there's an inference to be made from that, that they were pushing the asbestos felt…

  12. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · June 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Russell v. Illinois Central Railroad Company (2015)

    …throat as well.... He went on to answer the following question about both asbestos and tobacco smoke: Q. Do the larynx and the oropharynx have the same reactions to carcinogens? A. Can they both become cancerous…