No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

13 results for “Reaction Department”

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …effect. That OCF had direct knowledge of the hazardous nature of asbestos was evident in 1941, when one of the lawyers in its Legal and Patent Department, having received a letter from a Saranac Doctor, expressed…

  2. Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · May 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Baeth v. Liberty NW Ins. Corp. (2014)

    …usually ten years, from the time of exposure to the time of evaluation; and (3) evidence of structural changes caused by a reaction to the asbestos fibers.\[40\] ¶ 31 Dr. Black further explained that getting an…

  3. Blog · 2022

    Can Cats Be Harmed By Asbestos Exposure?

    …fibers become embedded, they cause inflammation and instigate an immune response, setting off a chain reaction that leads to the growth of unnatural and potentially malignant cell mutations. When these mutations become cancerous, it is known…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 20, 1990 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    …test. I imagine you had some reaction to what he said to you. THE WITNESS: He just said he seen \[sic\] some spots on the X-ray. THE COURT: Did you react to that or no…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …You mix them together. That starts the curing. That starts the chemical reaction for it to solidify. And we know that Mr. Bakkie was around the nitrogen gas that topped off the barrels of OPM because…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 14, 1999 · in the opinion

    Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …supra 671 A.2d at 1155 (reasoning that plaintiff injured by adverse reaction to prescription drug could not demonstrate causal connection between injury and manufacturer's allegedly deficient warning because plaintiff's treating physician testified that…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lopez v. the Hillshire Brands Company (2019)

    …summary adjudication of punitive damages in a negligence and strict products liability action. Plaintiff had a severe adverse reaction to an over-the-counter drug; at issue was whether the drug manufacturer had placed an adequate…

  8. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · April 13, 1999 · in the opinion

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …3201, listed specific activities by a defendant which would subject it to the personal jurisdiction of this state.\[2\] In reaction to [\885] the decision of the United States Supreme Court in World-Wide Volkswagen Corp…

  9. Court case · Utah Supreme Court · November 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Boynton v. Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC (2021)

    …and thereby injures another. In Jeffs, we found it foreseeable that negligently prescribing medications to a patient might result in the patient then injuring someone else in situations where the medications cause a psychotic reaction. Id. …

  10. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 4, 1996 · in the opinion

    Nugent v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Inc. (1996)

    …During the 30 to 36 months period, however, definite indication of tissue reaction [\928] appeared in the lungs of animals inhaling Kaylo dust and therefore, I regret to say, our tentative conclusion quoted above must be…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 7, 1998 · in the opinion

    ACandS v. Abate (1998)

    …they may pierce through the smallest airways into the pleura. The fibers that reach the pleura cause a localized reaction which results in a deposit of scar tissue. When the scarring of the pleura is localized…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 21, 2002 · in the opinion

    Ballard v. Armstrong World Indus. (Matter of Seventh Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 2002)

    …substantially the same questions of fact, as happens when large numbers of plaintiffs allege that they have developed similar illnesses in reaction to a particular toxic substance \ \ \ In such circumstances, consolidation permits the federal court to…

  13. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · August 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Chapp v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2019)

    …and a jury found, that latex gloves manufactured by Smith & Nephew were defective and unreasonably dangerous, and they were a cause of damages Green suffered as a result of her allergic reaction to them. See id., …