4 results for “Reaction Department”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994 · in the opinion
Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)
Flintkote's argument that this procedure provides a double recovery for inflation was rejected after thorough attention by the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, Fourth Department, in Brown v. State, 184 A.D…
-
Court case · Nebraska Supreme Court · June 1, 2007 · in the opinion
Olivotto v. DeMarco Bros. Co. (2007)
…on October 9, 1998, when she suffered a reaction to latex that required her to seek emergency medical treatment. She had noticed symptoms later associated with an allergy to latex in the 1980's, but the…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · November 2, 2016 · in the opinion
Pisano v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…9-1-29. The Rhode Island Legislature enacted § 9-1-29 in reaction to the elimination of the doctrine of privity in order to shield contractors, installers, and engineers from liability after a certain number of…
-
Court case · West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals · November 15, 1996 · in the opinion
Marlin v. Bill Rich Const., Inc. (1996)
…at 166 (citations omitted). In addition, the Court observed that "\[t\]he reasonableness of the plaintiff's reaction to the event will normally be a jury question." Id. at 491, 425 S.E.2d at 167…