No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · February 16, 2016 · in the opinion

    Walashek v. Air Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …Union Carbide Corporation, 231 Cal. App. 4th 962 (2014), Union Carbide argued that the testimony of plaintiff's expert that "\[a\]ll of the asbestos together contributes to cause mesothelioma," cannot be squared with Rutherford's…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Benavidez v. Fluor Corp. (2021)

    …causation.'" (Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 261, 289; see Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 969; McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 4, 2000 · in the opinion

    Wagner v. Apex Marine Ship Management Corp. (2000)

    …U.S. 133, 120 S.Ct. 2097, 147 L.Ed.2d 105, and Monaghan v. Union Pacific R. Co. (1993) 242 Neb. 720, 496 N.W.2d 895, are not particularly relevant to this case. Although…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)

    …Smith said he worked near insulation contractors, including "Armstrong." Smith did not explain whether he meant ACandS (Armstrong Contracting and Supply Corporation) or the distinct entity of Armstrong Cork Company. This ambiguous and bare testimony cannot…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion

    Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)

    …for his asbestos injuries and for his wife's loss of consortium. Billy Umphriss was employed as an engine supplyman and fireman for the Union Pacific Railroad from 1941 through 1942 and from 1950 through 1961…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    …words, plaintiffs may proffer evidence regarding "the amount of exposure" or "the duration of such exposure." Id. at 1176-77 (emphasis in original); see also Stephens v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 935 F.3d 852…