7 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · February 16, 2016 · in the opinion
Walashek v. Air Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…Union Carbide Corporation, 231 Cal. App. 4th 962 (2014), Union Carbide argued that the testimony of plaintiff's expert that "\[a\]ll of the asbestos together contributes to cause mesothelioma," cannot be squared with Rutherford's…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Walashek v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…P\]roof that raises mere speculation, suspicion, surmise, guess or conjecture is not enough to sustain \[the plaintiff's\] burden' of persuasion." Izell v. Union Carbide Corp., 231 Cal. App. 4th 962, 969 (2014) (quoting Ulwelling…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…by virtue of their employment, deemed to be sophisticated users."); Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp., 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 29-30, 117 Cal.Rptr.3d 791 (2010) (rejecting argument that defendant "was entitled to rely…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)
…the jury reasonably allocated a 70 percent share of comparative fault to JCI. (Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp. (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 33 \[117 Cal.Rptr.3d 791\] (Stewart) \[despite plaintiff's admission that…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009
Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)
…and Settlement Credits; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: his home and side construction jobs; engine rooms on ships union cement mason on residential and commercial construction projects 1946-1966; side construction jobs hanging drywall; home remodeling…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion
Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)
… 1431 et seq.).\[1\] Citing Munoz v. City of Union City (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 173 \[55 Cal.Rptr.3d 393\] (Munoz), they claimed federal sovereign immunity precluded the Navy from being a "tortfeasor" for…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…basis. b. Non-Pecuniary Damages Defendants Air & Liquid, BW/IP, Inc. ("BW/IP"), Cleaver Brooks, Inc. ("Cleaver Brooks"), Eaton Corporation ("Eaton"), Foster Wheeler, Gardner Denver Inc. ("Gardner Denver"), Greene, Tweed & Co., Inc. ("GT & Co."), J.R…