7 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)
…It is the appellant's affirmative burden to demonstrate otherwise. \[Citation.\]" (Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp. (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 33 (Stewart).) It is undisputed that Keeney served in the Navy for over 20…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 15, 2016 · in the opinion
DePREE v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)
…suppliers, jury could not infer without speculating that plaintiff was exposed to Union Carbide's joint compound as opposed to joint compound from other manufacturers, despite proof that Union Carbide joint compound was present at plant\]…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2023 · in the opinion
Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)
…No. 142 at 8 (Defendant Air & Liquid Systems Corporation recognizing that Yearsley is "a separate defense of derivative immunity"). In a final effort to persuade the Court to disregard Gomez, Defendants list several cases in which…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion
Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)
…for his asbestos injuries and for his wife's loss of consortium. Billy Umphriss was employed as an engine supplyman and fireman for the Union Pacific Railroad from 1941 through 1942 and from 1950 through 1961…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion
Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)
…in a different factual context. The defendant in Blackwell sold sulfuric acid to McKesson Chemical Company, which shipped the acid to its plant in a tank car designed and owned by Union Tank. (Id. at p…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion
Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)
…words, plaintiffs may proffer evidence regarding "the amount of exposure" or "the duration of such exposure." Id. at 1176-77 (emphasis in original); see also Stephens v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 935 F.3d 852…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…1174 (9th Cir. 2016), "did not reflect a uniquely maritime rule but instead was based on settled common-law principles described in the Restatement." See Stephens v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 935 F.3d 852…