No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

17 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rollin v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2012)

    …applies only if a manufacturer provided adequate warnings to the intermediary. \[Citations.\]" (Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp. (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 29.) No California court has applied the sophisticated intermediary doctrine to absolve a…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)

    …It is the appellant's affirmative burden to demonstrate otherwise. \[Citation.\]" (Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp. (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 33 (Stewart).) It is undisputed that Keeney served in the Navy for over 20…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)

    …that the employer carried workers' compensation insurance. Premises Owner Liability; Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Union Oil Los Angeles refinery (Unocal); Unocal refinery, Wilmington, Wilmington carpenter (scaffolding) Unocal refinery…

  4. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)

    … Premises Owner Liability; Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation; Loss of Consortium; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Union Oil Los Angeles refinery (Unocal); Unocal refinery, Wilmington, Wilmington carpenter (scaffolding) Unocal refinery, Wilmington Wilmington 1950's

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 20, 2007

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2007)

    …should have known of asbestos hazards supports a negligence verdict. Causation; Failure to Warn; Premises Owner Liability; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Union Oil Los Angeles refinery (Unocal); Unocal refinery, Wilmington, Wilmington carpenter (scaffolding) Unocal refinery…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 3, 2021

    Viale v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2021)

    …that a boiler at a military installation was a Foster Wheeler boiler was speculative. Another witness's statement that Foster Wheeler installed boilers throughout the North Bay rested on union-meeting talk, not his own observation…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)

    …Smith said he worked near insulation contractors, including "Armstrong." Smith did not explain whether he meant ACandS (Armstrong Contracting and Supply Corporation) or the distinct entity of Armstrong Cork Company. This ambiguous and bare testimony cannot…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Viale v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)

    …special interrogatories, excerpts from the deposition of each plaintiff, excerpts from the depositions of five individuals who worked with or around Viale at job sites, union records, social security earnings records (see Ogdie Decl. Ex. B…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 18, 2016 · in the opinion

    Marquez v. Pac Operating Limited Partnership (2016)

    …PAC was not a party to that stipulation. The witness was Richard Gooch, Director of Special Properties for the real estate department of Union Pacific Railroad (U.Pac.R.R.) in 1981, who worked for SPLC…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion

    Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)

    … 1431 et seq.).\[1\] Citing Munoz v. City of Union City (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 173 \[55 Cal.Rptr.3d 393\] (Munoz), they claimed federal sovereign immunity precluded the Navy from being a "tortfeasor" for…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2010 · in the opinion

    McCann v. Foster Wheller, LLC (2010)

    …Appellant waived the court's error, if any, in conducting a bench trial in derogation of appellant's right to a jury trial. (Taylor v. Union Pac. R. Corp. (1976) 16 Cal.3d 893, 900 \["a…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2019 · in the opinion

    Malek v. Chevron U.S.A. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …5th 391, 397-398, fn. omitted.) A duty of care may be created by "statute, contract, or the relationship of the parties." (National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Green v. CertainTEED Corporation (2015)

    …burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show the existence of a triable issue of material fact as to that cause of action. (Union Bank v. Superior Court (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 573, 583…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    BRIGITTE SCHILDKNEGT, Individually and as successor in interest to NICOLAAS SCHILDKNEGT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, etal., Defendants and Respondents. No. B255135. Filed June 27, 2019. Court of Appeals of California, Second…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)

    …To avoid possible influence from the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United States "devised a plan in which a consortium of newly-formed international corporations would operate the Abadan refinery and some of the…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Irani v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021)

    …global oil markets and avoid possible influence from the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United States "devised a plan for a consortium of Western corporations to support the Iranian Government in running its oil…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)

    MALEKEH KHOSRAVAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B304346. Filed April 20, 2021. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven. APPEAL from the judgment of the Superior…