No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 6, 2014

    Smith v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    Kenneth Smith, Jr. and Diane Smith sued many companies in Cook County, Illinois, state court. They claimed Kenneth developed an asbestos-related disease, including mesothelioma, from his work in the Navy from 1964 to 1968. For purposes of this…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 3, 2008 · in the opinion

    Gregory v. Beazer East (2008)

    …Beazer), Bondex International (Bondex), Exxon Mobil (Mobil), Georgia-Pacific Corporation (Georgia-Pacific) and Union Carbide Corporation (Union Carbide), regarding her husband's contraction of mesothelioma and subsequent death. Mobil moved for summary judgment on various grounds…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Linder v. AW Chesterton Co. (2020)

    …Foundry Company Including the American Brakeblok Division, Successor-by-Merger to the American Brakeshoe & Foundry Company and the American Brakeblok Corporation, f/k/a the American Brake Materials Corporation; Riley Power, Inc.; and Union Carbide Corporation…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 30, 2011

    Sublett v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2011)

    Joseph Sublett and his wife Virginia sued in Madison County, Illinois, state court, seeking damages for mesothelioma Mr. Sublett allegedly contracted from asbestos exposure. Part of the alleged exposure occurred while he served in the U.S. Navy…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 19, 2019

    Daniels v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2019)

    …not appear on the verdict form. Causation; Expert Testimony; Failure to Warn; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits; Trial Procedure and Discovery; Settlements and Releases Worksites: Chicago union pipefitter Chicago 1957-1998; union pipefitter Chicago 1957-1998

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …working foreman. As a nonworking foreman, under union rules, claimant could not handle the materials or tools — he functioned strictly as a supervisor. Claimant acknowledged that, as a union member, he abided by these rules. Consequently…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)

    …warning on Kaylo packages from 1943 to 1958 and Abex's attempt in 1975 to prevent inspectors of the Occupational Health and Safety Administration from mingling with union leaders during an inspection of an Abex plant…