No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 30, 2019

    Dugger v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)

    John Dugger, Jr., for himself and as personal representative of the estate of John Dugger, Sr., sued Honeywell International, successor to Bendix, along with other family members. They claimed Mr. Dugger developed pleural mesothelioma, which caused…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 22, 2017

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    The court granted five unopposed partial summary judgment motions for Union Carbide and Georgia-Pacific, ending the kidney cancer, breach of warranty, fraud, conspiracy, market share liability, aiding and abetting and punitive damages claims; strict liability…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    The court excluded the plaintiffs' experts' specific causation and "each and every exposure" opinions and granted summary judgment to Union Carbide and Georgia-Pacific on the Rockmans' remaining strict liability, negligence and loss of consortium claims…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 16, 2014

    Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)

    The court denied Union Carbide's motion in limine and its summary judgment motion on product identification, exposure and causation, but granted summary judgment to Union Carbide on the duty-to-warn claim and on the…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 25, 2013 · in the opinion

    Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2013)

    …the evidence showed that the plaintiff was exposed to Ford brakes only seven times 45 years before the suit was filed. A somewhat similar circumstance existed in Butler v. Union Carbide Corporation, 310 Ga.App. 21…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012

    Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)

    …grandparents' home), Washington; Forrestal Building, Washington high school student washing family laundry Forrestal Building (via grandfather's work clothes, washed at grandparents' home) Washington 1968-1969; union insulator (grandfather, Mr. Hentgen) Forrestal Building Washington 1968-1969

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)

    …contractors who supervised the workers, and union officials.'" Appellants misconstrue the "feasibility" discussion in Farrar. First, the Court never stated that the feasibility of the warning depended on the ability of the manufacturer to warn an…