7 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion
Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…ECF No. 502-7.) Moreover, both Arbogast and his coworker, Burnham, testified they could not identify the manufacturer of the material to which they referred as "Bakelite." (Def. Union Carbide Mot. Summ. J., Ex. C, Arbogast…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013 · in the opinion
Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)
…or been dismissed. According to Joyner, the defendants that remain in the case are John Crane, Inc.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Union Carbide Corp.; Kaiser Gypsum Co.; MCIC, Inc.; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.; CBS Corp. (as successor…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)
…analysis, and evaluation in the Construction Insulation Shop at a Union Carbide plant to resolve "unanswered health problems." Mr. Peele did not include Kaylo in the third of the three intervals of sampling because the first…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Rhodes v. McIC, Inc. (2016)
…Corp., Civ. No. 15-4516, 2015 WL 9311967 (E.D.La. Dec. 23, 2015); Sroka v. Union Carbide Corp., Civ. No. WDQ-13-3281, 2015 WL 794942 (D.Md. Feb. 24, 2015); Holdren v. Buffalo Pumps…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)
…pursuant to a mutual consent or agreement to become husband and wife made after the removal of what she supposed was a barrier. Id. at 253-54 (emphasis supplied). In National Union Fire Insurance Co. v…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 7, 1998 · in the opinion
ACandS v. Abate (1998)
…About two years after the symptoms began, Ciotta received a letter from his trade union regarding asbestos-exposure and was urged to have a chest X-ray. Ciotta got the X-ray and the doctors recommended…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)
…contractors who supervised the workers, and union officials.'" Appellants misconstrue the "feasibility" discussion in Farrar. First, the Court never stated that the feasibility of the warning depended on the ability of the manufacturer to warn an…