6 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Duffy v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…\]" (28) "Thos. Somerville Co.\[;\]" (29) "Trane U.S., Inc., as Successor to and f/k/a American Standard Companies, Inc.\[;\]" (30) "Union Carbide Corporation\[;\]" (31) "Uniroyal, Inc.\[;\]" (32) "The Walter E. Campbell Company, Inc.\[;\]" and (33…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Duffy v. CBS Corporation (2018)
… (28) Thos. Somerville Co.; (29) Trane U.S., Inc., as Successor to and f/k/a American Standard Companies, Inc.; (30) Union Carbide Corporation; (31) Uniroyal, Inc.; (32) The Walter E. Campbell Company, Inc.; and (33…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Hiett v. Ac&r Insulation Co., Inc. (2017)
…300 (finding that a defendant's internal corporate memoranda establishing actual knowledge was insufficient to establish a duty under Farrar because the plaintiff had not demonstrated "that better warnings by Union Carbide would have altered Mrs…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)
…pursuant to a mutual consent or agreement to become husband and wife made after the removal of what she supposed was a barrier. Id. at 253-54 (emphasis supplied). In National Union Fire Insurance Co. v…
-
Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024 · in the opinion
Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)
…Basil's alleged exposure, Paramount Global, the Appellee in this appeal, was called Westinghouse Electric Corporation. In their briefs, the parties use the name Westinghouse to refer to the Appellee, a practice we will continue in…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)
…contractors who supervised the workers, and union officials.'" Appellants misconstrue the "feasibility" discussion in Farrar. First, the Court never stated that the feasibility of the warning depended on the ability of the manufacturer to warn an…