6 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · January 23, 2023 · in the opinion
McDERMID v. 3M Company (2023)
…SAFEGUARD INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT CO., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, UNIROYAL, INC., Individually and as Successor to UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANY, INC., UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, URS ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, VIAD CORPORATION, f/k/a THE DIAL CORPORATION, (Sued Individually and…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 5, 2010 · in the opinion
Buttitta v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2010)
…successor corporation to ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., and as a successor in interest to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and BENDIX, LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC, LTC., MULTIC-HEVROLET, INC., NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., RAYMARK INDUSTRIAL DIVISION, UNION CARBIDE CORP., UNION…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 2, 2016 · in the opinion
Whelan v. Armstrong Int'l (2016)
…warn. III. We review orders granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Templo Fuente De Vida Corp. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 224 N.J. 189…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 5, 2005 · in the opinion
Olivo v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2005)
ANTHONY OLIVO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent, and OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; OWENS-CORNING CORP.; GAF CORP.; GARLOCK, INC.; FIBREBOARD CORP.; ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.; TURNER-NEWALL, LTD.; MONSANTO; UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO.; ASBESTOS…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Whelan v. Armstrong International Inc. (2018)
…warn. III. We review orders granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Templo Fuente De Vida Corp. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 224 N.J. 189…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 24, 2014 · in the opinion
Haas v. 3M Company (2014)
…Salerno, 937 F.2d 797, 806 (2d Cir. 1991)); see also Creamer v. Gen. Teamsters Local Union 326, 560 F. Supp. 495, 498-99 (D. Del. 1983) ("In order for testimony to be admissible under Rule…