No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

E. H. Jeffords to Sumner Simpson on Cutting Statements from the Public Health Service Dust Study (1937)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

A four-page letter of May 26, 1937, marked "Personal and Confidential" and sent by registered mail, from E. H. Jeffords, general manager of Raybestos-Manhattan's General Asbestos & Rubber Division at North Charleston, South Carolina, to Sumner Simpson, the company's president, with a copy to Julian Mitchell, the company's Charleston attorney. Jeffords sent Dr. R. R. Sayers's letter of May 20 and the U.S. Public Health Service's report on the plant, "A Study of Dust Control Methods in an Asbestos Fabricating Plant," and noted that the officials had examined the plant "but did not take any X-ray pictures of our employees." He called it "a very worthwhile examination" but wrote, "I do not think it would be well to publish this report in its present form," and listed the statements he wanted deleted first.

Author
E. H. Jeffords
Sent to
Sumner Simpson
Published by
Raybestos-Manhattan
Series
The Sumner Simpson Papers
Date
May 26, 1937
Number
Simpson no. 03317-03350
Library no.
ACL Doc 13279 · asbestosclaims.law/library/13279
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Letter, May 26, 1937 · 4 pages · 267 KB

What it shows

Jeffords's first objection was to the report's account of shutting off the exhaust fans for an hour, when dust concentrations rose steadily to about 50 million particles per cubic foot. He wrote that "it would be very bad to publish this report" with those statements, "for most of the individuals, who have brought suits against this Company, were working at this plant prior to the time we had succeeded in bringing our dust elimination system up to its present state of efficiency," and he asked that they "be eliminated from this report, if same is to be published." In the same passage he told Simpson that "nothing was known of the asbestos dust hazard, in this country, prior to 1929."

He also wanted cut the report's remark that stock rollers wearing respirators climbed into the bins to "tread-down" the stock, which he blamed on the habits of "our colored labor." He explained that the twisting machines were still unexhausted, as agreed with Mr. Fehnel of Metropolitan Life, because no one knew a way to exhaust them, and he read the report's conclusion as saying it was not yet settled what exposure "would cause trouble." The letter shows the plant's manager weighing a government study against the company's pending lawsuits before the company answered Sayers's request (Sayers to Jeffords, May 20, 1937). Jeffords began by recalling Simpson's letters of the fall of 1936 that allowed the survey (October 31 and November 5, 1936).

In Johns-Manville's index

Johns-Manville's attorneys indexed the Sumner Simpson Papers. Their index describes this document as follows:

Transmittal of letter from Sayer dated 5/20/37 and USPHS report "A Study of Dust Control Methods in an Asbestos Fabricating Plant." Jeffords outlines various portions of the report he feels should be changed or deleted before permission to publish the report is granted.

About this copy

This is document 03317-03350 of the Sumner Simpson Papers, as numbered in the collection's index.

Cited on this site

Cite this document

“E. H. Jeffords to Sumner Simpson on Cutting Statements from the Public Health Service Dust Study.” May 26, 1937. The Sumner Simpson Papers, Simpson no. 03317-03350. Raybestos-Manhattan. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 13279. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/13279.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.