Union Carbide's Answers and Objections to Bednorz's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission, Bednorz v. GAF Corp. (2001)

Union Carbide's written answers, responses and objections to the plaintiff's first interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission in Bednorz v. GAF Corporation, a Dallas County, Texas case. Union Carbide limited its answers to its Port Lavaca facility, objected to many requests, said it could neither admit nor deny most admissions, and stated it would supplement or make materials available. Includes answers on warnings, safety policies and exposure.

People and organizations

From Brent M. Karren (Attorney for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation, Dehay & Elliston, L.L.P.); Misti D. Mosteller (Attorney for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation, Dehay & Elliston, L.L.P.) to Russell W. Budd (Attorney for Plaintiff Clarence Floyd Bednorz, Baron & Budd).

• Brent M. Karren (author)
• Misti D. Mosteller (author)
• Russell W. Budd (recipient)
• Union Carbide Corporation (its organization)
• Baron & Budd (named)
• DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P (named)
• GAF Corporation (named)

About this copy

This is document UC-2034 of the Union Carbide documents, documents produced and used as evidence in asbestos lawsuits against Union Carbide, 81 pages.