You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
Armstrong Cork Company's answers to the plaintiffs' first interrogatories in Lee Lloyd Copeland and Vaudeen Copeland v. Armstrong Cork Company (Case No. 79-8413, Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida), served April 21, 1981, with a cover letter of May 4, 1981, sending a copy to Rodger Wilson in Johns-Manville's legal department. Armstrong said it made two asbestos insulation products, LT Cork Covering (asbestos paper facing from 1956 until 1959) and Armaspray, a sprayed mineral wool insulation with amosite and chrysotile (1966 to 1968), and resold other makers' asbestos insulation from about 1941 through 1957, among them Unarco's Armabestos, Owens-Illinois's Kaylo and Ehret and Keasbey & Mattison 85% magnesia. It said it gave no warnings with its products, did no health testing before sale, and first became aware of an "alleged ascertainable relationship" between asbestos and disease in 1968.
- Author
- M. Stephen Smith III
- Published by
- Armstrong Cork Company
- Date
- April 21, 1981
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 24428 · asbestosclaims.law/library/24428
- Rights
- Filed in court; a public court record, republished for public information.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Interrogatory answers with insurance schedules, 1981 · 1.1 MB
What it shows
The answers give the sources of Armaspray's fiber (chrysotile from Lake Asbestos of Quebec, then amosite and chrysotile from North American Asbestos Corporation of Chicago) and explain why the fiber was switched in 1967 and 1968. Armstrong blamed the plaintiff for not using "mask or respiratory where available" and for ignoring warnings, while answering elsewhere that it knew of no warnings on its products. Attached schedules list Armstrong's products liability insurers from 1946 to 1981 (Standard Accident, Travelers, Aetna, Liberty Mutual and excess carriers); the Liberty Mutual policies for 1977 to 1979 carry a "$50,000 deductible on each asbestosis claim." Armstrong gave similar answers in a Texas case later that year: Armstrong World Industries' Answers to Interrogatories in Evilsizor v. Fibreboard Corporation (1981).
About this copy
The last three pages of the file, a schedule of workers' compensation claims for asbestosis filed against Armstrong Cork from 1952 to 1966, are left out because they give claimants' home addresses in a document less than 50 years old.
Cited on this site
Cite this document
M. Stephen Smith III. “Armstrong Cork Company's Answers to Interrogatories in Copeland v. Armstrong Cork.” April 21, 1981. Armstrong Cork Company. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 24428. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/24428.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.