No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Hart and Wedgeworth v. Armstrong Cork, Motion to Compel, Defendants' Supplemental Answers and Expert Witness CVs (1981)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

Court papers from the consolidated Mississippi shipyard cases of Roy Latharn Hart and Lelos Wedgeworth against Armstrong Cork Company and others in federal court at Biloxi, May to July 1981. The plaintiffs moved to compel Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Celotex, Owens-Illinois, Raybestos-Manhattan, Unarco and other makers to answer supplemental interrogatories, calling their answers "vague and general conclusions of counsel" that did not "recite one single specific fact." The file also holds J-M Sales Corporation's verifying affidavit, the defendants' fuller answers of June 1981, a magistrate's order of June 8 and a district judge's order of July 1, 1981, requiring the defendants to answer "fully and without evasion" questions about polls of potential jurors, and résumés of the defense's medical experts.

Author
Roy C. Williams; Blatt & Fales; Cupit & Maxey
Published by
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Date
May 12, 1981
Number
Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-004823–004868, 004771–004793
Library no.
ACL Doc 24627 · asbestosclaims.law/library/24627
Rights
Filed in court; a public court record, republished for public information.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Court papers, May–July 1981, with expert CVs · 3.1 MB

What it shows

The defendants' answers show how the makers meant to defend the cases. They said the shipyard workers failed to use respirators and exhaust fans made available to them, ignored warning labels that appeared "from and after at least 1964," kept smoking, and misused products: some would "wrap up in such cloth" to shield themselves from welding, and others "used asbestos cloth and other products as pillows or blankets." They blamed the unions, the Navy, the Maritime Commission, the Coast Guard, Ingalls Shipbuilding and its owner Litton, and the yard's insurer, American Mutual. Their list of 29 expert witnesses included Dr. Paul Kotin, Dr. Paul Gross, Dr. George W. Wright and Dr. Hans Weill. The plaintiffs said the defense had named more than 1,000 witnesses and believed some defendants had polled potential jurors before seeking a change of venue. The plaintiffs' earlier interrogatories are on a separate page; Kotin's testimony in other cases is in his 1979 videotaped deposition.

About this copy

Three résumé pages that give private home addresses (pages 51, 52 and 62 of the file, for Drs. William Weiss, David Thorning and George Wright) are left out.

Cited on this site

Cite this document

Roy C. Williams, Blatt & Fales, Cupit & Maxey. “Hart and Wedgeworth v. Armstrong Cork, Motion to Compel, Defendants' Supplemental Answers and Expert Witness CVs.” May 12, 1981. Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-004823–004868, 004771–004793. U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 24627. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/24627.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.