Million particles per cubic foot (mppcf) is the unit used to report dust levels before fiber counting replaced it. It counts all visible dust particles in a cubic foot of air, whether or not they are asbestos fibers.
Origin
The unit came from counting impinger samples under the light microscope. In 1938 the U.S. Public Health Service proposed 5 mppcf as a tentative limit for asbestos dust, and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists adopted 5 mppcf as its threshold limit value in 1946. It remained the reference figure until fiber-based limits were adopted around 1970.
Significance in Asbestos Context
Exposure reconstructions for work before about 1970 often have to convert mppcf into fibers per cubic centimeter (f/cc) to estimate cumulative dose. There is no single conversion factor: the ratio varied by industry, by process and by the sampling and counting method, and published factors differ widely. A dose estimate that depends on one factor should say which it used and why. Historically, the 5 mppcf guideline is also evidence of what industry and government considered acceptable at the time, which bears on state-of-the-art arguments.
Example Sentence
The industrial hygienist converted the 1960s readings of 8 to 15 mppcf into fiber counts using a range of published factors, rather than a single figure.
Related Terms
Midget Impinger, Threshold Limit Value (TLV), Fibers per Cubic Centimeter (f/cc), Cumulative Exposure, Fiber Year, State-of-the-Art Defense
Notes
- Ask any expert who converts mppcf to f/cc to show the factors used and how sensitive the result is to them.
In the research library
10 studies in our medical research library mention Million Particles per Cubic Foot (mppcf) in the title or abstract. Among the most cited:
- Dust exposure and mortality in chrysotile mining, 1910-75J.C. McDonald, F.D. Liddell, G.W. Gibbs, et al, 1980 · British Journal of Industrial Medicine · cited 259 times
- Mortality of workers employed in two asbestos cement manufacturing plantsJ.M. Hughes, H. Weill, Y.Y. Hammad, 1987 · British Journal of Industrial Medicine · cited 118 times
- The 1891-1920 birth cohort of Quebec chrysotile miners and millers: development from 1904 and mortality to 1992F.D. Liddell, A.D. McDonald, J.C. McDonald, 1997 · The Annals of Occupational Hygiene · cited 96 times
- The 1891-1920 birth cohort of Quebec chrysotile miners and millers: mortality 1976-88J.C. McDonald, F.D. Liddell, A. Dufresne, et al, 1993 · British Journal of Industrial Medicine · cited 92 times
- A review of historical exposures to asbestos among skilled craftsmen (1940-2006)P.R. Williams, A.D. Phelka, D.J. Paustenbach, 2007 · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part B, Critical Reviews · cited 53 times
The journals that publish most on it: British Journal of Industrial Medicine (5), The Annals of Occupational Hygiene (4), Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part B, Critical Reviews (1).
Category: Dose-Response & Exposure Metrics · All Lexicon terms A–Z
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.