Our plain-English summary of A narrative review of the health disparities associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma, by D.C. Freudenberger, R.D. Shah (Journal of Thoracic Disease, 2021).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: D.C. Freudenberger, R.D. Shah
- Journal: Journal of Thoracic Disease
- Published: 2021;13(6):3809-3815
- Type of article: Review
- Cited by: 8 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher · Free full text
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a cancer of the mesothelial lining of the pleura that has traditionally been associated with asbestos exposure in an industrial setting. Asbestos usage has fortunately been banned or phased out in most industrialized countries resulting in its decline in countries such as the United States. Despite this, MPM continues to place significant burden on its affected patients resulting in overall poor prognosis and survival. Questions arise as to what factors, especially what health disparities, contribute to the disease's dismal prognosis. This article will present a narrative review of recent literature that identifies the impact age, sex, race, access to medical centers, and economics have on the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of MPM. As will be discussed, research has shown that factors including younger age, female sex, non-white race, private insurance, Medicare, and higher income have been associated with better survival in MPM. Whereas older age, male sex, white race, lack of insurance, and lower income are associated with worse survival. The identification of these and other health disparities related to MPM may allow for future research, clinical guidelines, and policies to be implemented to decrease the burden health disparities create in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of patients with MPM.
2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
In plain English
This article was a narrative review of earlier studies, not new research. The authors searched PubMed for peer-reviewed English-language articles from 1990 to 2019 on how age, sex, race, income, insurance and access to specialist hospitals relate to diagnosis, treatment and survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma. They included 18 articles, 13 with United States data. In one United States database study, female sex was associated with longer survival than male sex (adjusted hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.82), and a French study found median survival of 18.2 months in women versus 14.1 months in men. Another study linked white race to worse survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.30) and a median income of $63,000 or more to better survival. Studies found that older and uninsured patients were less likely to be treated, black patients were less likely to have surgery, and high-volume hospitals followed national treatment guidelines more often than low-volume ones. The authors concluded that causes of these disparities need further study. Most data came from the United States.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Narrative review of published literature identified through a PubMed search
- Who was studied: 18 peer-reviewed articles published 1990 to 2019, in English. 13 of 18 had United States data; the rest covered global data and data from France, Australia and Italy. 13 of 18 were retrospective studies.
- Exposure: Not an asbestos exposure study. The factors reviewed were patient age, sex, race, socioeconomics and access to care, in relation to diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.
- Main results:
- In a 2015 SEER database study by Taioli et al. cited by the review, female sex was independently associated with greater survival than male sex (adjusted HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.82).
- In a French study cited by the review, women had a median overall survival of 18.2 months and men 14.1 months (P less than 0.001). After adjustment for age and comorbidities, female sex remained a positive prognostic factor (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.92).
- In a cited National Cancer Data Base study (Saddoughi et al.), white race was independently associated with worse overall survival (adjusted HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.30, P less than 0.001).
- In cited SEER data from 1973 to 2009, 18% of black patients received cancer-directed surgery compared with 24% of white patients (P less than 0.001).
- In a cited 2017 United States study, only 54% of patients aged 66 years and older received systemic therapy. Comorbidities were not independently associated with whether elderly patients received treatment.
- In a cited study, uninsured patients were less likely to receive treatment than patients with private insurance (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.62, P=0.040) or Medicare (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.86, P=0.027).
- In the cited Saddoughi et al. study, a median income of $63,000 or more was associated with better survival (adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.90, P less than 0.001).
- In a cited 2019 study by Espinoza-Mercado et al., high-volume centers complied with national treatment guidelines more often than low-volume centers (OR 3.58, 95% CI 2.34 to 5.49, P less than 0.001). Academic centers complied more often than nonacademic centers (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.90).
- The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that the review identified some disparities affecting patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. They wrote that the factors contributing to these disparities need continued investigation to improve prognosis and outcomes.
- Limitations the authors state:
- Most of the articles and data were specific to the United States, so disparities unique to other countries were not discussed in depth.
- The included articles on health insurance were limited to United States studies.
Topics
Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Pleural Mesothelioma, Pleura, Asbestos Exposure, Prognosis.
Related studies
- Bad Jobs, Bad Health? How Work and Working Conditions Contribute to Health Disparities — S.A. Burgard, K.Y. Lin (2013)
- Public health advocacy strategies to influence policy agendas: lessons from a narrative review of success in trade policy — B. Townsend, B.F. Tenni, et al. (2023)
- A framework of NGO inside and outside strategies in the commercial determinants of health: findings from a narrative review — B. Townsend, T.D. Johnson, et al. (2023)
- Work-related respiratory health conditions among construction workers: a systematic narrative review — E.F. Boadu, S.R. Okeke, et al. (2023)
- Perceptions of health hazards in the narratives of Italian migrant workers at an Australian asbestos mine (1943-1966) — F. Cappelletto, E. Merler (2003)
- Human Exposure to Asbestos in Central Asian Countries and Health Effects: A Narrative Review — Z. Kurzhunbaeva, K. Dzhusupov, et al. (2024)
Browse more research in Journal of Thoracic Disease, or return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
D.C. Freudenberger, R.D. Shah. A narrative review of the health disparities associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Journal of Thoracic Disease 2021;13(6):3809-3815. doi:10.21037/jtd-20-3516. PMID: 34277071.
Cite our summary
“A narrative review of the health disparities associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/a-narrative-review-of-the-health-disparities-associated-with.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.