Analytical characterization of cell-asbestos fiber interactions in lung pathogenesis

Our plain-English summary of Analytical characterization of cell-asbestos fiber interactions in lung pathogenesis, by S. Yao, G. DellaVentura, C. Petibois (Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2010).

The study

• Authors: S. Yao, G. DellaVentura, C. Petibois
• Journal: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
• Published: 2010;397(6):2079-89
• Type of article: Review
• Cited by: 14 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher

Abstract

Asbestos is a fiber causing lung diseases such as asbestosis and mesothelioma. Although the process involving these diseases remains to be elucidated for developing drugs and treatments, direct consequences of fiber exposure in humans have been clearly demonstrated. These diseases are first characterized by histological heterogeneity and combine chronic inflammation with fibrosis and cellular alterations. As a consequence, asbestosis is usually diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease and treatments are usually inefficient to cure the patients. Here, we review the links established between asbestos fiber chemistry and morphology with the occurrence of associated lung diseases. Cytological and histological aspects of diseases are described with respect to current analytical capabilities, notably for microscopy techniques.

In plain English

This article was a review, not a new study. The authors reviewed published work linking asbestos fiber chemistry and shape to lung diseases, and described methods for detecting both. They covered the amphiboles (actinolite, amosite, anthophyllite, crocidolite, tremolite) and serpentine (chrysotile). Citing earlier studies, they described amphibole fibers as resisting acid and staying in the lung much longer than chrysotile. They discussed asbestosis, pleural plaques, lung cancer and malignant mesothelioma. They wrote that CT/PET imaging was not efficient for diagnosing early stages of disease. Light microscopy could not tell fiber types apart and missed fibers thinner than 0.2 micrometres. Electron microscopy could identify fiber chemistry but had poor sensitivity. A table pooled three earlier studies (234 cases) comparing asbestos bodies in lung-washing fluid and lung tissue. Pooled sensitivity was 65.4% and specificity 85.7%, using at least 1 asbestos body per mL of fluid as a marker of at least 1,000 per gram of lung tissue. The authors concluded that laboratory tools are required to examine asbestos bodies. They called for combined imaging giving chemical and structural information on asbestos with concurrent analysis of cell biochemistry.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Narrative review of published literature
• Who was studied: No new patients or samples were studied. The article reviewed earlier published research.
• Exposure: Asbestos fibers of two mineral families: amphiboles (actinolite, amosite, anthophyllite, crocidolite, tremolite) and serpentine (chrysotile)
• Main results:
  • Citing earlier work, the review described amphibole fibers as not dissolving at neutral to acid pH. As a result they clear more slowly and remain longer, or even indefinitely, in the lung.
  • Citing earlier work, the review stated that patients with asbestosis have up to 200,000 fibers per gram of dry lung, mostly amphibole fibers.
  • The review stated that CT/PET imaging is not efficient for diagnosing early stages of disease.
  • Light microscopy cannot distinguish fiber types. It has a resolution limit of 0.2-micrometre diameter, so a substantial proportion of fibers will not be detected.
  • Electron microscopy (TEM or SEM) has poor analytical sensitivity: it cannot detect concentrations below 50,000 fibers per gram or 50 fibers per milliliter.
  • A table compiled three earlier studies (De Vuyst et al., Sebastien et al., Karjalainen et al.). They compared asbestos body counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, below 1 versus at least 1 per mL, with counts in lung tissue, below 1,000 versus at least 1,000 per gram. The pooled 'meta-analysis' row covered 234 cases, with sensitivity 65.4% and specificity 85.7%.
  • According to the table caption, high asbestos body counts in lavage fluid correlate with high counts in lung tissue. A lavage finding below 1 asbestos body per mL does not rule out above-reference levels in the lung.
• The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that in vitro (laboratory) tools are required for pathological examination of asbestos bodies. They argued for a multimodal imaging approach that gives both chemical and structural information on asbestos, with concurrent analysis of cell biochemistry.
• Limitations the authors state:
  • The authors noted that the exact relationship between fiber number, type and size and the appearance of asbestosis has not been studied in detail.
  • The authors noted a poor understanding of how asbestos induces cancer.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Mesothelioma, Chronic Inflammation, Fibrosis.

Related studies

• Analytical tools for the analysis of β-carotene and its degradation products — H. Stutz, N. Bresgen, et al. (2015)
• Synchrotron X-ray microscopy reveals early calcium and iron interaction with crocidolite fibers in the lung of exposed mice — L. Pascolo, G. Zabucchi, et al. (2016)
• Bioanalytical techniques for detecting biomarkers of response to human asbestos exposure — C. Mesaros, A.J. Worth, et al. (2015)
• Analytical implications of epidemiological concepts of interaction — N. Pearce (1989)
• Soluble mesothelin related peptides (SMRP) and osteopontin as protein biomarkers for malignant mesothelioma: analytical validation of ELISA based assays and characterization at mRNA and protein levels — A.J. Rai, R.M. Flores, et al. (2010)
• Combined use of X-ray photoelectron and Mössbauer spectroscopic techniques in the analytical characterization of iron oxidation state in amphibole asbestos — M. Fantauzzi, A. Pacella, et al. (2010)

Browse more research in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, or return to medical research.