Our plain-English summary of Asbestos as a hazard to health. Fact and speculation, by W.C. Cooper (Archives of Environmental Health, 1967).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Author: W.C. Cooper
- Journal: Archives of Environmental Health
- Published: 1967;15(3):285-90
- Cited by: 11 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher
- In J-M's library: Johns-Manville's company medical library held a copy (J-M no. 001475).
In plain English
This article is a review, read as a talk at a 1967 meeting of the American Academy of Occupational Medicine, in which the author weighed published and some unpublished evidence on asbestos and health. The author wrote that asbestosis found in insulating workers suggested that the recommended average dust level of 5 million particles per cubic foot may be too high. The author called increased lung cancer in many groups of asbestos-exposed workers a fact, but judged the evidence on different fiber types unconvincing, with chrysotile less certainly implicated. For mesothelioma of the pleura and peritoneum, evidence was described as strongest for crocidolite, especially Cape blue crocidolite, and a Finnish report was cited as suggesting anthophyllite was not a problem in this respect. Reviewed autopsy series found ferruginous ('asbestos') bodies in many lungs, such as 26.4% of 500 consecutive autopsies in Cape Town, but no published study had shown whether the bodies were asbestos. The author concluded that links between asbestos and cancers of the lung, pleura and peritoneum had become increasingly convincing.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Narrative review, originally a talk read before the 19th annual meeting of the American Academy of Occupational Medicine (San Francisco, February 1967)
- Who was studied: No study population of its own. The author reviewed published epidemiologic studies of asbestos workers, pathology and animal studies, and autopsy series of lungs from several cities (for example Cape Town, Miami, Pittsburgh, Johannesburg, Finland, Montreal, San Francisco). Some unpublished observations were also included.
- Exposure: Asbestos minerals of commerce: chrysotile, crocidolite, amosite and anthophyllite, with tremolite and actinolite described as less important. The review also covered dust levels measured in million particles per cubic foot (mppcf).
- Main results:
- From reports on insulating workers in which asbestosis appeared even though average dust counts were near or below 5 mppcf, the author suggested that a time-weighted average of 5 mppcf may be too high.
- The author described an increased incidence of lung cancer in many groups of asbestos-exposed workers as a fact.
- The author judged the evidence on the relative importance of different asbestos types for lung cancer not convincing, with chrysotile less certainly implicated.
- For diffuse pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma, the author stated that the evidence was strongest for crocidolite, especially Cape blue crocidolite.
- Citing a Finnish report by Raunio, the author wrote that anthophyllite was strongly suggested not to be a problem with respect to these tumors. In that report, high prevalences of pleural calcification in anthophyllite mining areas were not associated with more lung cancer or malignant pleural or peritoneal tumors.
- In autopsy series reviewed by the author, ferruginous ('asbestos') bodies were found in 26.4% of 500 consecutive autopsies in Cape Town (Thomson et al, 1963).
- Ferruginous bodies were found in 27.2% of 400 autopsies in Miami (reported in 1966).
- In none of the small autopsy series that tried to relate the bodies to diagnosis was there any apparent association with malignancies or other specific causes of death.
- The authors' conclusion: The author concluded that present dust-control standards did not appear adequate to prevent asbestosis over a working lifetime, and that associations between asbestos minerals and malignancies of the lungs, pleura and peritoneum had become increasingly convincing. The author also concluded that the mineral fibers behind ferruginous bodies in the general population needed positive identification before their health significance could be estimated.
Topics
The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Asbestosis, Lung cancer.
Related studies
- Facts, rumours and speculations about the mesothelioma epidemic — J.P. van Meerbeeck, R. Damhuis (2011)
- The art of perpetuating a public health hazard — M. Greenberg (2005)
- Environmental and occupational health hazards associated with the presence of asbestos in brake linings and pads (1900 to present): A "state-of-the-art" review — S.S. Paskal (2004)
- Knowledge of the health hazard of asbestos prior to the Merewether and Price report of 1930 — M. Greenberg (1994)
- Asbestos cancer: past and future hazards — J.C. Gilson (1973)
- Application of sprayed inorganic fiber containing asbestos: occupational health hazards — W.B. Reitze, W.J. Nicholson, et al. (1972)
Browse more research in Archives of Environmental Health, or return to medical research.
Cited by Barry Castleman
In Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects (5th edition, 2005), which cites it in:
- Chapter 4 (Thresholds and Standards), p. 265, note 200
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
W.C. Cooper. Asbestos as a hazard to health. Fact and speculation. Archives of Environmental Health 1967;15(3):285-90. doi:10.1080/00039896.1967.10664919. PMID: 6035076.
Cite our summary
“Asbestos as a hazard to health. Fact and speculation.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/asbestos-as-a-hazard-to-health-fact-and-speculation.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.