No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Asbestos exposure and asbestosis: clarifying terminology and avoiding confusion

Our plain-English summary of Asbestos exposure and asbestosis: clarifying terminology and avoiding confusion, by P.K. Woodard, H.P. McAdams, C.E. Putman (Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1995).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

In plain English

This short article from the Department of Radiology at Duke University Medical Center was a review and commentary, not a study of patients, and it reported no new data. The authors argued that 'asbestos exposure' and 'asbestosis' are often wrongly used as if they meant the same thing. In their terms, asbestosis is interstitial fibrosis (scarring of the lung tissue) caused by asbestos dust. Asbestos exposure, by contrast, shows up as non-cancerous pleural disease: pleural effusions, pleural plaques, diffuse pleural fibrosis and round atelectasis. They wrote that patients with asbestosis present like usual interstitial pneumonitis, with a prognosis usually no better. Citing other studies, they noted that one large study found benign pleural effusions in 34% of patients exposed to asbestos. They also noted that about 10-20% of patients with tissue evidence of asbestosis have been shown to have normal chest X-rays. They called the use of high-resolution CT to detect early asbestosis controversial and said the term 'pleural asbestosis' is best not used. The authors concluded that imaging must be matched with exposure history, lung function tests and symptoms before asbestosis is diagnosed.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Narrative review and commentary on terminology and diagnosis (no original patient data)
  • Who was studied: No study population; the article discusses patients with asbestos exposure and asbestosis in general, illustrated with example radiographs and CT images
  • Exposure: Asbestos exposure in general (asbestos dust); no specific fiber types, products, jobs or doses are discussed
  • Main results:
    • The authors distinguished asbestosis (interstitial fibrosis) from 'asbestos exposure', which they described as showing up in tissue and on imaging as non-neoplastic pleural disease
    • Patients with asbestosis present with features of usual interstitial pneumonitis (UIP), and their prognosis is usually no better
    • Listed manifestations of asbestos exposure: pleural effusions, pleural plaques with or without calcification, diffuse pleural fibrosis, and round atelectasis
    • Cited from another study (not this article's data): benign pleural effusions were present in 34% of patients exposed to asbestos in one large study
    • Cited from other work: about 10-20% of patients with histologic evidence of asbestosis have been shown to have normal radiographs, so the American Thoracic Society criteria underestimate early disease
    • The authors described the use of high-resolution CT to detect early asbestosis as controversial, because many of its findings are also seen in other conditions, most notably UIP
    • The authors recommended against the term 'pleural asbestosis' for pleural plaques and pleural fibrosis
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that plain radiograph and HRCT findings must be correlated with exposure history, pulmonary function tests and symptoms before diagnosing asbestosis. They also concluded that recognising asbestosis as a separate entity matters clinically because prognosis often differs from that of asbestos exposure alone.

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Asbestosis.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Asbestos Exposure.

Browse more research in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

P.K. Woodard, H.P. McAdams, C.E. Putman. Asbestos exposure and asbestosis: clarifying terminology and avoiding confusion. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1995;88(12):669-71. doi:10.1177/014107689508801204. PMID: 8786585.

Cite our summary

“Asbestos exposure and asbestosis: clarifying terminology and avoiding confusion.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/asbestos-exposure-and-asbestosis-clarifying-terminology-and-avoiding.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.