Asbestos exposure and lung cancer

Our plain-English summary of Asbestos exposure and lung cancer, by C.S. Lee, W.A. Cooper (Pathology, 2004).

The study

• Authors: C.S. Lee, W.A. Cooper
• Journal: Pathology
• Published: 2004;36(6):513-4
• Type of article: Comment, Editorial
• Cited by: 1 article, as counted by NIH iCite
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher

In plain English

This was an editorial, not a research study, and it reported no new data. Written by the editor of Pathology and a colleague in Sydney, Australia, it introduced a review by Henderson and colleagues in the same issue. The authors wrote that mesothelioma is recognised as directly linked to asbestos, but that the link between asbestos and lung cancer remained controversial, with cigarette smoking the obvious confounding factor. They outlined three hypotheses from earlier writers: lung cancer risk rises only when asbestosis is present; asbestos dose rather than fibrosis determines risk; or any level of exposure could raise risk, with no specific threshold or linear dose-response relationship. According to the editorial, the Henderson review concluded that asbestos itself, rather than asbestosis, underlies lung cancer development, and its findings strongly supported the cumulative exposure model. The authors noted problems in earlier studies that treated asbestosis as an obligatory step. They wrote that patients with asbestosis probably have an increased risk of dying from lung cancer, which may reflect a dose-related effect.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: editorial (commentary introducing a review published in the same journal issue); no original data
• Who was studied: No study population. The editorial comments on a review by Henderson et al. in the same issue of Pathology and on earlier published studies.
• Exposure: Asbestos in general, as used in building materials and for insulation in Australia and elsewhere; no fiber types or doses specified
• Main results:
  • The authors stated that mesothelioma is recognised as directly linked to asbestos exposure, but that the relationship between asbestos exposure and lung cancer remains controversial.
  • The authors identified the potentiating effect of cigarette smoking as the obvious confounding factor in analysing asbestos's contribution to lung cancer.
  • Drawing on earlier summaries by Churg and Roggli, the editorial listed three hypotheses. The first is that lung cancer risk is increased only when asbestosis is present. The second is that dose rather than fibrosis determines risk.
  • The third hypothesis listed is that any level of asbestos exposure can potentially increase lung cancer risk, with no specific threshold or linear dose-response relationship between asbestos exposure and lung cancer.
  • According to the editorial, the Henderson review concluded that asbestos itself, rather than the presence of asbestosis, forms the basis of lung carcinogenesis. The authors wrote that the review's findings strongly supported the cumulative exposure model.
  • The editorial noted problems raised by others in earlier studies proposing that asbestosis is an obligatory step to lung cancer. These included case selection, unconventional histological criteria for asbestosis, and lack of statistical power.
  • The authors wrote that it is probably fair to say that patients with asbestosis have an increased risk of dying from lung cancer.
• The authors' conclusion: The authors suggested that the association seen in some studies between asbestosis and a high incidence of lung cancer may be accounted for by a dose-related effect, although this may not be provable by epidemiological studies. They also suggested that future molecular and genetic studies may help clarify how asbestos fibres may cause lung cancer.

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Asbestosis, Lung cancer.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Asbestos Exposure, Lung Cancer.

Related studies

• Asbestos exposure in lung carcinoma: a necropsy-based study of 414 cases — C. Bianchi, A. Brollo, et al. (1999)
• Asbestos fiber burdens in lung tissues of Hong Kong Chinese with and without lung cancer — Y. Liu, P. Zhang, et al. (2001)
• Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20 expression in epithelial neoplasms: a survey of 435 cases — P. Chu, E. Wu, et al. (2000)
• GATA3: a multispecific but potentially useful marker in surgical pathology: a systematic analysis of 2500 epithelial and nonepithelial tumors — M. Miettinen, P.A. McCue, et al. (2014)
• Reactive and neoplastic serosal tissue. A light-microscopic, ultrastructural, and immunocytochemical study — J.W. Bolen, S.P. Hammar, et al. (1986)
• Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancy: experience with 1,000 patients — E.A. Levine, J.H. Stewart, et al. (2014)

Browse more research in Pathology, or return to medical research.