Our medical research library holds 8 studies published in Mutagenesis (1987–2013). Each entry links to the study's record on PubMed and, where there is one, to the publisher's page and a free full text. 8 have an abstract, the authors' own summary as PubMed records it: open "Abstract" to read it.
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
About the journal
- Publisher: Oxford University Press
- Published: 1986 to the present, England
- Language: English
- ISSN: 0267-8357 (print), 1464-3804 (electronic)
- Its record in the NLM Catalog
2010s
-
Differential mutation profiles and similar intronic TP53 polymorphisms in asbestos-related lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma. P. Andujar, J.C. Pairon, A. Renier, et al. 2013;28(3):323-31. PubMed · Publisher
Abstract
Given the interest in defining biomarkers of asbestos exposure and to provide insights into asbestos-related and cell-specific mechanisms of neoplasia, the identification of gene alterations in asbestos-related cancers can help to a better understanding of exposure risk. To understand the aetiology of asbestos-induced malignancies and to increase our knowledge of mesothelial carcinogenesis, we compared genetic alterations in relevant cancer genes between lung cancer, induced by asbestos and tobacco smoke, and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a cancer related to asbestos, but not to tobacco smoke. TP53, KRAS, EGFR and NF2 gene alteration analyses were performed in 100 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, 50 asbestos-exposed and 50 unexposed patients, matched for age, gender, histology and smoking habits. Detailed assessment of asbestos exposure was based on both specific questionnaires and asbestos body quantification in lung tissue. Genetic analyses were also performed in 34 MPM patients. TP53, EGFR and KRAS mutations were found in NSCLC with no link with asbestos exposure. NF2 was only altered in MPM. Significant enhancement of TP53 G:C to T:A transversions was found in NSCLC from asbestos-exposed patients when compared with unexposed patients (P = 0.037). Interestingly, TP53 polymorphisms in intron 7 (rs12947788 and rs12951053) were more frequently identified in asbestos-exposed NSCLC (P = 0.046) and MPM patients than in unexposed patients (P < 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively). These results emphasise distinct genetic alterations between asbestos-related thoracic tumours, but identify common potential susceptibility factors, i.e. single nucleotide polymorphisms in intron 7 of TP53. While genetic changes in NSCLC are dominated by the effects of tobacco smoke, the increase of transversions in TP53 gene is consistent with a synergistic effect of asbestos. These results may help to define cell-dependent mechanisms of action of asbestos and identify susceptibility factors to asbestos.
-
Asbestos exposure affects poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 activity: role in asbestos-induced carcinogenesis. M. Tomasetti, M. Amati, L. Nocchi, et al. 2011;26(5):585-91. PubMed · Publisher
Abstract
Asbestos is known to induce malignant mesothelioma (MM) and other asbestos-related diseases. It is directly genotoxic by inducing DNA strand breaks and cytotoxic by promoting apoptosis in lung target cells. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) is a nuclear zinc-finger protein with a function as a DNA damage sensor. To determine whether PARP1 is involved in asbestos-induced carcinogenesis, PARP1 expression and activity as well as DNA damage and repair were evaluated in circulating cells of asbestos-exposed subjects, MM patients and age-matched controls. PARP1 expression and activity were also evaluated in pleural biopsies of MM patients and compared with normal tissue. Accumulation of the pre-mutagenic 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine and elevated PARP1 expression were found both in asbestos-exposed subjects and MM patients. Although PARP1 was highly expressed, its activity was relatively low. Low DNA repair efficiency was observed in lymphocytes from MM patients. High expression of PARP1 associated with low PARP activity was also found in MM biopsies. To mimic PARP1 dysfunction, PARP1 expression and activity were induced in immortalised mesothelial cells by their exposure to asbestos in the presence of a PARP1 inhibitor, which resulted in transformation of the cells. We propose that exposure to asbestos inhibits the PARP1 activity possibly resulting in higher DNA instability, thus causing malignant transformation.
2000s
-
Possible involvement of XPA in repair of oxidative DNA damage deduced from analysis of damage, repair and genotype in a human population study. M. Dusinská, Z. Dzupinková, L. Wsólová, et al. 2006;21(3):205-11. PubMed · Publisher
Abstract
Participants in a study of occupational exposure to mineral fibres in Slovakia were analysed for the polymorphism 23A-->G in the DNA repair gene XPA. Of the 388 subjects, 239 were exposed to asbestos, stonewool or glass fibre; the rest were unexposed controls. Levels of DNA base alterations (oxidation and alkylation) in lymphocytes were measured using the comet assay with lesion-specific endonucleases. 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) DNA repair activity was measured, as incision activity of a lymphocyte extract on DNA containing the OGG1 substrate 8-oxoguanine. Presence of the A allele was associated with higher levels of DNA damage (sites sensitive to formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase, endonuclease III or 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase II) as well as with higher activity of OGG1 repair enzyme. DNA base damage increased with age, showing highly significant correlations when the whole population or subgroups of the population were analysed. OGG1 repair activity also increased with age, but when analysed according to XPA genotype, the increase was observed only in those individuals with an A allele. Although XPA is known as a protein involved in nucleotide excision repair of UV-induced damage and bulky DNA adducts, it may also have a role in the repair of oxidized bases.
-
DNA breakage in asbestos-treated normal and transformed (TSV40) rat pleural mesothelial cells. V. Levresse, A. Renier, F. Levy, et al. 2000;15(3):239-44. PubMed · Publisher
Abstract
Asbestos has been shown to induce cell cycle arrest, DNA repair and some abnormalities consistent with DNA damage but not DNA breakage. The purpose of the study was to investigate DNA breakage in asbestos-exposed rat pleural mesothelial cells (RPMC). RPMC were compared with their transformed counterparts, RPMC-TSV40 (i.e. p53-inactivated by infection with a retroviral recombinant encoding the SV40 large T antigen), as in the latter cells the cell cycle does not arrest and DNA repair is deficient due to ineffective p53-dependent cell cycle control. RPMC and RPMC-TSV40 were exposed to chrysotile and crocidolite asbestos and also to camptothecin for comparison. The presence of DNA breakage was determined using the single cell gel (Comet) assay with alkaline electrophoresis and quantified by measuring comet tail length (TL) and the percentage of total DNA in the tail and calculating tail moment (TM). We found that comets were generated by both types of asbestos in RPMC and in RPMC-TSV40 as well as by camptothecin in RPMC. On a per weight basis, chrysotile induced more abnormalities in comet parameters than did crocidolite. The comet TL and TM increased with fibre concentration, although less so with crocidolite than with chrysotile. When exposed to chrysotile at similar concentrations, RPMC consistently showed more abnormal comet parameters than did RPMC-TSV40. We concluded that asbestos causes DNA breakage and suggest that some of the DNA breakage measured was due to repair mechanisms in the normal RPMC.
1990s
-
Modulation of genotoxic and related effects by carotenoids and vitamin A in experimental models: mechanistic issues. S. De Flora, M. Bagnasco, H. Vainio. 1999;14(2):153-72. Review PubMed · Publisher
Abstract
The mechanisms involved in the modulation of genotoxic and related effects by carotenoids and vitamin A were inferred from a critical review of an ad hoc constructed database. Almost 500 results were generated in experimental models evaluating the activity of 32 structurally, metabolically and functionally related nutrients, including beta-carotene and 26 other carotenoids, retinol, retinal, all-trans-retinoic acid and retinyl esters. As many as 67 experimental test systems, either in vitro or in vivo, used a variety of cellular targets and/or end-points suggestive of distinctive mechanisms of action. The bulk of available data support the view that carotenoids and vitamin A do not induce genotoxic effects per se. Even in the absence of any genotoxic agent, these nutrients appeared, on the contrary, to display some mechanisms which play protective roles in tumor promotion and progression, such as inhibition of N-myc gene expression resulting in antiproliferative effects, up-regulation of cell-to-cell communication, an increase in connexin 43 gene expression, a decrease in the 'spontaneous' cell transformation frequency and induction of differentiation in vitro. A large number of studies investigated the modulation by carotenoids and vitamin A of genotoxic and related effects produced by 69 genotoxicants, including biological agents, physical agents, chemical compounds and complex mixtures. In spite of some discrepant data, the general trend was that both carotenoids and vitamin A are poorly effective in acting as nucleophiles, nor do they appear to substantially interfere with the induction or repair of DNA damage produced by direct-acting agents. In contrast vitamin A and carotenoids, irrespective of their provitamin A role, in most studies inhibited those genotoxicants which require metabolic activation to electrophilic derivatives in either bacterial or mammalian cells. Coupled with biochemical data, the distinctive patterns observed with genotoxic agents belonging to different chemical classes suggest a complex modulation of both phase I and phase II enzymes involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics. Furthermore, carotenoids and vitamin A shared other protective mechanisms, such as scavenging of genotoxic oxygen species, modulation of signal transduction pathways, inhibition of cell transformation induced by physical and chemical agents, and facilitation of intercellular communication inhibited by genotoxic compounds. Therefore, carotenoids and vitamin A appear to work via multiple mechanisms, which would support a potential protective role in cancer initiation and in the pathogenesis of other mutation-related diseases. These conclusions are consistent with the recognized cancer-preventive activity of these nutrients in certain animal models and with the evidence provided by observational epidemiological studies, which suggested cancer-protective effects at many sites as related to their dietary intake or plasma levels. However, all these lines of evidence and mechanistically based premises contrast with the unexpected outcome of recent clinical intervention trials, which raised the concern that supplemental use of beta-carotene and vitamin A may increase the risk of lung cancer amongst high risk individuals such as tobacco smokers and asbestos-exposed workers.
-
Metsovo-tremolite asbestos fibres: in vitro effects on mutation, chromosome aberration, cell transformation and intercellular communication. K. Athanasiou, S.H. Constantopoulos, E. Rivedal, et al. 1992;7(5):343-7. PubMed · Publisher
Abstract
Samples of Metsovo-tremolite asbestos, previously found to be the causative agent of endemic pleural calcification and an increased level of malignant pleural mesothelioma in a rural area of north-western Greece (Metsovo area), were tested in various in vitro toxicity test systems. It was found that asbestos fibres of this type were strong inducers of micronuclei and numerical chromosomal abnormalities while they induced low levels of chromosomal aberrations in mammalian cells in culture. Furthermore, this type of asbestos can induce a low level of in vitro transformation of Syrian hamster embryo cells. The fibres had no effect on gap-junctional cell-cell communication (followed by the dye-transfer method) and did not induce any mutations in the Salmonella typhimurium strain TA102 which is known to be sensitive to the action of various oxidative agents. These results support the hypothesis generated from studies on other types of asbestos that such fibres induce tumours by causing chromosomal mutations.
1980s
-
Use of the orthogonal design method to study the synergistic effects of asbestos fibres and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) in the BALB/3T3 cell transformation system. Y.P. Lu, C. Lasne, R. Lowy, et al. 1988;3(4):355-62. PubMed · Publisher
Abstract
An orthogonal design method was used to study the transforming effects of chrysotile and crocidolite asbestos fibres in BALB/3T3 cells. Three experiments, designed by tables L9 (3(4)), L8 (2(7)) and L6 (3(1) x 2(2)) of the orthogonal method respectively, were performed separately. The results indicate exponential reductions in survival of treated cells concomitant with a linear increase in exposure concentrations from 0.1 to 10.0 micrograms/cm2, and that chrysotile was more toxic than crocidolite; the total transformation frequency was significantly increased with both chrysotile and TPA concentrations. There was synergism between chrysotile and TPA in sequential treatment, which suggests that chrysotile is an initiator and has a complete transforming effect at 10.0 micrograms/cm2. Crocidolite only has an initiating-like effect within the dose range of 0.1-10.0 micrograms/cm2, and no synergistic effect when associated with TPA.
-
Performance of short-term tests for detection of human carcinogens. T. Kuroki, T. Matsushima. 1987;2(1):33-7. Review PubMed · Publisher
Abstract
The performance of short-term tests for detection of carcinogens has been validated by several investigators and international collaborative programmes. A large number of chemicals have been tested by the Salmonella/microsome assay and high values of sensitivity and specificity, often greater than 70%, were reported. For 71 human carcinogens classified in Groups 1, 2A and 2B by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the Salmonella/microsome test showed a sensitivity of 62.1%: 36 were positive out of 58 chemicals tested. Similar or rather higher values were obtained with Escherichia coli mutation assay (72.0%, 18/25), mutation assays in fungi (78.9%, 30/38), mutation assays in insects (65.7%, 23/35), and assays measuring DNA damage in prokaryotes (80.5%, 33/41). In assays using mammalian cells, tests on chromosomal anomaly showed a relatively high sensitivity: 61.7% (29/47) in chromosomal structural aberration assays and 80.6% (25/31) in sister chromatid exchange (SCE) assays. Comparable values were also obtained in mutation assays of mammalian cells (73.0%, 27/37) and cell transformation assays (87.5%, 21/24). Results of monitoring of exposed populations did not necessarily show a high sensitivity to human carcinogens (44.4%, 12/27). Human carcinogen data were further analysed in order to find a combination of tests which may increase the predictive value. Among human carcinogens, 17 chemicals are not mutagenic in the Salmonella/microsome assay. Although 9 of 17 chemicals (asbestos, hormones, chlorinated compounds and 1,4-dioxane) were not positive in any short-term assays, some gave positive results in a variety of assays, e.g. arsenic and benzene were positive in assays of chromosomal anomaly in mammalian cells in vitro. Combinations of the Salmonella/microsome assay with certain tests using mammalian cells were found to increase the sensitivity significantly. Chromosomal anomaly assays of mammalian cells in vitro seem to be most relevant for detection of human carcinogens when used in combination with the Salmonella/microsome assay.
Browse every journal in the library or the library by type of article, or return to medical research.
Cite this page
“Mutagenesis.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/journals/mutagenesis.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.