Our plain-English summary of New anaerobic methods, by W.G. Smillie (The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1917).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Author: W.G. Smillie
- Journal: The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Published: 1917;26(1):59-66
- Cited by: 7 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher · Free full text
Abstract
- Anaerobic methods have been devised which depend upon the catalytic action of platinized asbestos upon hydrogen and oxygen. 2. The methods may be utilized for the growth of anaerobes in test-tubes, upon Blake bottles, in flasks, and in a large container. 3. Because oxygen is so completely removed, the methods are of great value in the successful cultivation of absolute anaerobes.
In plain English
This 1917 paper from The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research described equipment for growing anaerobic microorganisms, from partial anaerobes such as the tetanus bacillus to absolute anaerobes. It did not study asbestos exposure or any health effect of asbestos. Platinized asbestos appeared only as a catalyst that made hydrogen and oxygen combine into water, removing oxygen from culture containers. The author described versions for test-tubes, a large jar, Blake bottles and flasks. In the test-tube version, an electrically heated catalyst was reported to always remove the oxygen, whereas Laidlaw's earlier method frequently failed. With it, the fusiform bacillus grew profusely. The globoid bodies of poliomyelitis formed colonies after 6 to 7 days, but only from fluid subcultures, never directly from brain and cord. The author stated that the jar process should take about 15 minutes; in the Blake bottle, oxygen was replaced in 5 minutes. The perforated-bulb design was not satisfactory in single test-tubes. The author warned that air rushing in mid-process could cause a slight explosion. The author concluded that the methods were of great value for growing absolute anaerobes.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Description of new laboratory methods (bacteriological technique paper); not a study of asbestos health effects
- Who was studied: No human or animal subjects. Cultures of anaerobic microorganisms were grown at The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. These included partial or relative anaerobes (tetanus bacillus, Bacillus botulinus) and stricter or absolute anaerobes (fusiform bacillus, globoid bodies of poliomyelitis). The paper was published in 1917.
- Exposure: Platinized asbestos used as a laboratory catalyst to remove oxygen; no fiber type named and no human exposure studied
- Main results:
- In test-tubes, the electrically heated catalyst method always removed the oxygen, whereas the Laidlaw method frequently failed
- With the test-tube method, the fusiform bacillus grew profusely
- Globoid bodies of poliomyelitis showed no growth for 4 to 5 days. Colonies appeared at 6 to 7 days, and some reached about 1 mm in diameter
- Growth of the poliomyelitis globoid bodies was never obtained directly from the original brain and cord material, only from fluid culture tubes
- The author stated that the anaerobic jar process should take about 15 minutes (a guide figure, not a reported measurement)
- In the Blake bottle, oxygen was replaced by hydrogen in 5 minutes
- The author stated there was no explosion danger in the jar when used correctly, but warned of a possible slight explosion if air rushed in over the catalyst during the process
- The authors' conclusion: The author concluded that, because oxygen is so completely removed, the methods are of great value in cultivating absolute anaerobes
- Limitations the authors state:
- The perforated-bulb design was not satisfactory in single test-tubes because of the small air space
- Results obtained with these methods, particularly the jar, were left for a later paper
Related studies
- Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 2: TILs in Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinomas, Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Mesothelioma, Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, Genitourinary Carcinomas, and Primary Brain Tumors — S. Hendry, R. Salgado, et al. (2017)
- A method for extracting ferruginous bodies from sputum and pulmonary tissue — M.J. Smith, B. Naylor (1972)
- A novel method for accurate collagen and biochemical assessment of pulmonary tissue utilizing one animal — C.R. Kliment, J.M. Englert, et al. (2011)
- Comparison of exposure assessment methods for occupational carcinogens in a multi-centre lung cancer case-control study — S. Peters, R. Vermeulen, et al. (2011)
- Rapid and easy method for monitoring oxidative stress markers in body fluids of patients with asbestos or silica-induced lung diseases — K. Syslová, P. Kacer, et al. (2009)
- Assessing the origin and fate of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb, and V in industrial polluted soil by combined microspectroscopic techniques and bulk extraction methods — R. Terzano, M. Spagnuolo, et al. (2007)
Browse more research in The Journal of Experimental Medicine, or return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
W.G. Smillie. New anaerobic methods. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 1917;26(1):59-66. doi:10.1084/jem.26.1.59. PMID: 19868135.
Cite our summary
“New anaerobic methods.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/new-anaerobic-methods.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.