Our plain-English summary of Perspectives in the development of asbestos litigation and its future implications, by A.H. Parnell (American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 1986).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Author: A.H. Parnell
- Journal: American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
- Published: 1986;47(11):708-11
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher
- In J-M's library: Johns-Manville's company medical library held a copy (J-M no. 001142).
In plain English
This 1986 article is a commentary by a lawyer, not a research study, and it reports no new data. The author, a partner in an Atlanta law firm, discussed factors the author believed shaped asbestos lawsuits in the United States, which the author said began effectively in 1977. The author wrote that more than 300 companies had been named as defendants, suspected that another 15 000 to 25 000 workers' compensation cases had been filed, and noted that the litigation had provoked three bankruptcies. The article described changes since the 1920s in industry, communication and medical knowledge. It also described the legal shift toward strict liability, mass production, and the long delay before cancers appear. The author argued that relying on what was known at the time a product was made had failed as a defense. The author also argued that cigarette smoking confounded the diagnosis of asbestos-related disease. The article discussed criticism of both plaintiff and defense lawyers. The author concluded that there were no utopian solutions and expected more claims and suits. Parts of the scanned text are unreadable.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Commentary or opinion article by a lawyer; no original data
- Who was studied: No study population. The article discusses asbestos lawsuits in United States state and federal courts, which the author said began effectively in 1977. The author was a partner at Freeman & Hawkins, Atlanta, Georgia.
- Exposure: Asbestos in general, as the subject of tort lawsuits brought for alleged injury from inhaling asbestos fibers; no specific fiber types are discussed
- Main results:
- The author wrote that more than 300 companies had been named as defendants in the tort actions
- The author suspected that an additional 15 000 to 25 000 workers' compensation cases had been filed
- The author stated that the litigation had provoked three bankruptcies
- The author argued that industrial hygiene and working hours acceptable in the 1920's were no longer considered acceptable by the 1960's, and that juries might not appreciate this change
- The author described how many states had moved from negligence-based liability to strict liability in tort
- The author argued that mass production meant many people could be exposed before a product's harm was recognized
- The author argued that the defense that manufacturers did not know of the dangers at the time had been soundly defeated in many instances
- The author argued that cigarette smoking was a confounding factor that made it hard to separate asbestos-related disease from smoking-related disease
- The author argued that excessive defense lawyer involvement or fees were the fault of those who hired them
- The authors' conclusion: The author concluded that there were no utopian solutions and no immediate relief, and expected more asbestos-exposed individuals to claim injury and more suits to be filed
Related studies
- Tobacco and asbestos litigation — T.R. Goffe (1986)
- Widening perspectives of occupational lung disease — I.J. Selikoff (1973)
- Asbestos: scientific developments and implications for public policy — B.T. Mossman, J. Bignon, et al. (1990)
- The Public Health Value of Opioid Litigation — R.L. Haffajee (2020)
- Tobacco and asbestos litigation — K. Anderson, F. Moran (1986)
- Epidemiology and the law: courts and confidence intervals — T. Christoffel, S.P. Teret (1991)
Browse more research in American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, or return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
A.H. Parnell. Perspectives in the development of asbestos litigation and its future implications. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 1986;47(11):708-11. doi:10.1080/15298668691390520. PMID: 3799468.
Cite our summary
“Perspectives in the development of asbestos litigation and its future implications.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/perspectives-in-the-development-of-asbestos-litigation-and-its-future.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.