No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Semantics and the application of the ILO classification: the need for recording visceral pleural manifestations separately

Our plain-English summary of Semantics and the application of the ILO classification: the need for recording visceral pleural manifestations separately, by A. Solomon (International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2002).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

In plain English

This was a letter to the editor, not a research study, and it reported no new data. The author argued that the ILO classification, a standard system for reading chest X-rays for dust-related lung disease, should record asbestos-related changes of the visceral pleura (the lining covering the lung) separately from changes of the parietal pleura (the lining of the chest wall). Citing earlier studies, the author stated that diffuse pleural thickening, without lung scarring, results in impaired lung function, while pleural plaques alone are not recognized as causing significant impairment. The author noted that the type of pleural change can determine compensation eligibility. According to the author, thickening of the lung fissures appeared only in the subset of symbols. Pleural strand formation could be recorded only under "comments" in the 1980 edition and 1997 draft. Rounded atelectasis fell outside the main section for pleural changes. The author warned that linear calcification along the chest wall could be misread as plaque calcification. The author concluded that visceral pleural changes deserve separate inclusion in any revised ILO classification.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Letter to the editor (opinion/commentary); no original data
  • Main results:
    • Citing earlier studies, the author stated that diffuse pleural thickening without parenchymal fibrosis results in impaired lung function, while pleural plaques alone are not recognized as being associated with significant respiratory impairment
    • The author stated that the nature of the pleural changes can determine a worker's eligibility for compensation
    • The author argued that thickening of the interlobar fissures is currently relegated to the subset of symbols in the ILO classification rather than its main body
    • The author noted that pleural strand formation is not addressed in the 1980 revised edition or the 1997 revised draft and can be recorded only under "comments"
    • The author argued that diffuse linear calcification along the lateral chest wall could be misinterpreted as plaque calcification
    • The author noted that rounded atelectasis (folded lung) is recorded outside the main body of the ILO section for pleural changes
    • The author argued that separating benign parietal pleural changes from visceral pleural changes is necessary because the latter can be associated with lung function impairment
  • The authors' conclusion: The author concluded that asbestos-related visceral pleural manifestations deserve separate inclusion in any revised ILO classification

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Pleural plaques and thickening.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: ILO Classification.

Browse more research in International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

A. Solomon. Semantics and the application of the ILO classification: the need for recording visceral pleural manifestations separately. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 2002;8(3):288-9. doi:10.1179/107735202800338849. PMID: 12358088.

Cite our summary

“Semantics and the application of the ILO classification: the need for recording visceral pleural manifestations separately.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/semantics-and-the-application-of-the-ilo-classification-the-need-for.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.