Some personal observations on industrial health in the United States of America

Our plain-English summary of Some personal observations on industrial health in the United States of America, by B. Harvey (British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1954).

The study

• Author: B. Harvey
• Journal: British Journal of Industrial Medicine
• Published: 1954;11(3):222-6
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

In plain English

This 1954 article was not a research study. It was a personal account by a British factory inspector of industrial health in the United States, written from impressions gained during a Rockefeller Foundation fellowship visit. The article does not mention asbestos. The author described American "industrial hygiene" (measuring and controlling airborne contaminants) as having grown out of state compensation laws and insurance companies, at first separately from industrial medicine. The author observed that official US dust standards relied on the Greenburg-Smith impinger, which may allow much respirable dust to escape. The author noted that substituting a safer material was treated in the US as the last line of defence, whereas in Britain it was the first. The author also wrote that American insistence on scientific proof might delay control measures and leave some occupational diseases undiagnosed. On medical examinations, the author noted that pre-employment exams were becoming stricter and that periodic exams could sometimes be used instead of controlling hazards. The author concluded that the main impression was a lack of coordination and of national statistics on industrial disease. The author said the views were personal and could not be wholly objective.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Personal observations and commentary (not a research study)
• Who was studied: Industrial health practice in the United States, observed by a British Factory Inspector during a Rockefeller Foundation fellowship at the Harvard School of Public Health (published 1954)
• Exposure: No specific exposure was studied. The article discusses industrial hazards in general, including dust, beryllium, benzene, noise, carbon monoxide and radioactive isotopes. Asbestos is not mentioned.
• Main results:
  • The author observed that the American approach began with industrial hygiene and industrial medicine developing separately.
  • US dust standards were based on sampling with the Greenburg-Smith impinger, which, according to recent investigations the author cites, may allow much dust of respirable size to escape.
  • Among proposed defences against industrial poisons, the author noted that substitution of the dangerous material came last in the US, whereas in Britain it came first.
  • The author wrote that American industry's insistence on scientific proof of toxic dangers may delay control measures, which may account for some occupational diseases going undiagnosed in the US.
  • The author noted that periodic medical examinations may be used as a substitute for controlling hazards, by moving workers out of dangerous environments before they develop symptoms that would qualify for compensation.
  • The author reported that the US lacked accurate national statistics on the incidence and morbidity of industrial disease.
• The authors' conclusion: The author concluded that the main impression was a lack of coordination among those working on industrial health in the US. Without a national enforcement service, there were no national statistics on industrial disease, which made American efforts hard to assess.
• Limitations the authors state:
  • The author stated that no one can assess another country's institutions wholly objectively.
  • The views expressed are the author's personal views, not necessarily those of the Ministry of Labour and National Service.

Related studies

• Changes in B-readings over time in the United States Navy Asbestos Medical Surveillance Program — J.G. Muller, W.G. Rudolph, et al. (2007)
• EVOLUTION OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS — H. Heimann, V.M. Trasko (1964)
• Industrial workers' health and environmental pollution under the new international division of labor: the Taiwan experience — M.S. Chen, C.L. Huang (1997)
• Late industrial development and occupational health in southern Italy — G. Assennato, L. Bisceglia, et al. (2005)
• Geologic occurrences of erionite in the United States: an emerging national public health concern for respiratory disease — B.S. Van Gosen, T.A. Blitz, et al. (2013)
• Comment on "Mesothelioma from asbestos exposures: Epidemiologic patterns and impact in the United States" by R A Lemen, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B 2016;19:250-265 — C. Magnani, D. Mirabelli, et al. (2017)

Browse more research in British Journal of Industrial Medicine, or return to medical research.